Taking the city of Everett to task & dealing with corruption in govt

I have big big big plans for my future: Most of that involves getting the people who are running this city & county out of office or unemployed. My issue started with:

1) An ignorant prejudice portly animal control officer ~ Lori Trask, Lemaire, Staib Carlon
2) A POS shelter manager & assistant manager ~ Bud Wesman & Shannon Johnson, Delgado

Bud Wessman was running the city shelter & the non-profit for the shelter which is a conflict, then he went away & left Shannon Delgado in charge.

My foster son was just murdered 2 days ago & I see my attorney who texted me previously to tell me that the city of Everett is dragging me back into court, he never told me what time though. At no time have I been given proper notice but that is the norm.

I seen him on Wednesday & he tells me that Judge Mitchell is coming out of retirement just for me to hear my case. If that doesn’t show how personal his vendetta is against me then I am not sure what does. So what does my attorney do? Well the usual ~ NOTHING.

THIS is the corruption that is so rampant in this city & county.

So for everyone I have written about: Thank your city shelter workers Trask, & Delgado, the city of Everett Prosecutor Mike Fisher, the city attorney Jim Iles & Judge Mitchell. They started this new path I am on. All I wanted was my dogs & cat back & to get on with my life. Now they are probably dead & I don’t have anything else to focus on but them & all the corrupt leaders in this county

If they hadn’t screwed me so completely & violated every single right I have as a human being I never would’ve known about any of this. I’d just be in my own little world rescuing animals, but they did & now…

I have learned & so will they

There are some very important things that people need to know. YOU are responsible for all of the corruption going on. Yes, YOU. You & I vote these morons in, WE allow them to act this way.

Most of my regular readers know I am a Minister. I originally became ordained to make money for my rescue by doing weddings & blessings.

One of the perks of being a Minister is you get a press pass which means that I can go to council meetings & other functions as a member of the press/ministry. So I don’t have to fill out their little comment forms for them to pick & chose IF they will let me speak ~ so far they NEVER have.

So that got me to thinking, I am a “Blogger” but I have the same qualifications & protections as a “Journalist” because I “gather & disseminate information to serve the general public”

So why not just start an online newspaper? I have people who will advertise on our page & I can get a business license for it & register with the state. I can also get at least 2500 “subscribers” to begin with which meets all the legal definitions. Now here is the beauty of it, I can designate it as a not for profit newspaper.

Newspapers get most if not all of their public records for free. “Freedom of the press” so that will make it possible for me to get the info I need to be able to do more in depth stories & get the truth out about these lowlifes we are letting run amok in our government.

Mainstream media tends to bash folks who blog, or make multiple records requests almost to the point of demonizing them. Why? I am not sure, maybe it’s the editor’s call, maybe they don’t want the competition, maybe even both. They tend to have a monopoly on breaking news & scoops but as the internet grows so does access to information that was once jealously guarded by the big media outlets. Yet even they have to get their info from a few blogs. I know that there have been at least 5 other stories done on information I broke here, maybe more.

Sitting around whining about the condition this country is in is useless, you have to get involved in the process. You don’t have to spend 24 hours day at it, just a couple hours a week. Get a group of like minded folks together & get involved in your local city, or town government to start with, then look at your county & your state.

Hell even if you just focus on your own city or town that is enough if enough people do the same. If people spent the time on getting involved in the process as they did on Facebook things we could wipe out corruption in no time flat! (Then you can get back to playing with angry birds)

Here are 3 simple things YOU can do:
1st ~ check out the candidates that you are voting for, thoroughly.
2nd ~ VOTE!
3rd ~ Make your presence known to keep them on their toes ~ question every thing they do, & every dime they spend

Go to council meeting, get copies of the city town or county’s operating budget, learn how your local govt works & why.

On that note my new accomplices & I will be going to different communities to help people learn how to blog, request records, & start their own organizations to fight corruption in their own communities. I predict that this will be a raging success.

I do believe a lot of people WANT to get involved in the process, they just don’t know how to start. I am going to change that.

I will also be putting up a page here with the information you need to get things started as soon as I am able. I need to be able to grieve for a while so I will either get right on it or be sitting in a corner crying ~ Please bear with me


wordpress visitor

John E Pennington criminal record/misuse of time Snohomish County D.E.M.

Remember when I said…

If I ever got the chance to meet Anne Block that there was going to be a problem for Snohomish County?

I did & there is.

I thought they screwed me over, but they have done everything humanly possible to destroy this woman. They seem to have gotten away with most of it, & they seem to always prevail at all the dirty tricks they use but as the saying goes “Every dog has it’s day but every dog has it’s dog”

It’s like the conga line of corruption. Not just one person or one agency, they all seem to be working together to destroy her. Evidently they ALL have something to hide.

Why else would they come together on account of one single woman?

Public records are a powerful thing ESPECIALLY when the people in charge so blatantly conspire against this woman on the county dime & as a group. They believe they are so untouchable that they don’t even try to hide their crimes. Yes they are crimes but in Snohomish County they can they have & they will get away with it.

This corruption runs so deep that there is no place, no agency, no division that is not dripping in shit.

Let’s start with John Pennington…

So the county has ran several background checks on Ms Block Tit for tat.

Pennington001So I am getting mixed messages about this criminal background check. A very seasoned PR/HR person tells me that the “Harrassment W/Prior Harsmnt” is that just means he had prior acts of harassment that culminated in this one charge but a very seasoned detective said that he has a prior conviction of harassment.

The fact remains he was kicked out of his church for sexually abusing kid(s), (confirmed by church members) & that he is the prime suspect in the rape of a child, (confirmed by police ~ still waiting for those records & will post)  that he is a wife beater, stalker & an abuser & he is getting paid for his govt job with OUR tax money with a FAKE degree. That should piss you off, if it doesn’t then I don’t know what would.

So I made a trip down to the court house & what I found was horrifying, there are SO many people involved in his cover up that it would make your head spin. Government employees all emailing back & forth writing statements to bash his ex-wife during county & state time which is illegal but it went in front of a Superior court Judge who did NOT take notice or even mention that it was happening: Not just in ONE case but in TWO. You cannot conduct personal business on city, county, or state computers when you are supposed to be working, period.

Here is just one just at the county level. The other one has to be an entire blog post on it’s own because it involves the other people involved in the cover up of the abuse that this woman endured.

Some would say his private life is his own & that would be true if he wasn’t using county resources & tax-payer money to abuse one of his many wives. Reading these files just broke my heart to imagine this woman living like this for YEARS with no one to reach out to, no one to believe her & with people in power protecting this man…. but this is the “norm” in Snohomish County. There are 100’s of pages so I got what I could I will get more as finances permit

Pennington002Pennington003Pennington004Pennington005 Pennington006Pennington007Pennington008Pennington009Pennington010Pennington011Pennington012Pennington013Pennington014Pennington015Pennington016Pennington017Pennington018Pennington019Pennington020Pennington021Pennington023Pennington024Pennington025




wordpress visitor

Now everyone knows that everyone else knows… I don’t know what else to do :~(

In my frustration I sent an email to everyone I could think of… The ONLY response I got was from the Washington State Bar Association that said they don’t take grievances via email! If you have any questions as to why corruption is SO RAMPANT in our state then refer back to my blog. Any grunt employee or reporter could’ve simply got off their hind end, & even read my page, I HAVE ALREADY DONE THE WORK FOR THEM, & done a story or investigated these matters themselves, but they won’t. I mean how rude of me: Why in the world would I expect them to do their jobs, or go to bat for justice or honor, silly me…

Subject: Tim Rasmussen-Stevens County, Ginger Luke-Pet Rescue Scam, Snohomish County Jail Deaths, Thurston County Ponzi scheme, Taamu V the City of Everett
From: Life Matters (saving_them_all@yahoo.com)
To: AskDOJ@usdoj.gov; cjc@cjc.state.wa.us; Commissioners@hum.wa.gov; hispanic@cha.wa.gov; info@oah.wa.gov; ltgov@leg.wa.gov; mail@sos.wa.gov; ocla@ocla.wa.gov; mhurtad@goia.wa.gov; opd@opd.wa.gov; pdc@pdc.wa.gov; support@leg.wa.gov; timf@atg.wa.gov; us.marshals@usdoj.gov; wmaurer@ij.org; alex.acosta@usdoj.gov; harts@ojp.usdoj.gov; john.g.malcolm@usdoj.gov; paul.d.clement@usdoj.gov; Peter.Keisler@usdoj.gov; aaronreardon@yahoo.com; aschauffler@king5.com; ari.kohn@postprisonedu.org; ariels@nwjustice.org; brad.klippert@leg.wa.gov; bruce.chandler@leg.wa.gov; jnessel@ccrjustice.org; rabbi@jewishsnohomish.com; Charlotte_L._Montiel@who.eop.gov; cegan@king5.com; cdaniels@king5.com; droseontv@yahoo.com; david.frockt@leg.wa.gov; davidk3@atg.wa.gov; deborah.eddy@leg.wa.gov; dsmith@heraldnet.com; firstfreedom@usdoj.gov; dginsburg@cadc.uscourts.gov; doronlinetaxfacts@dor.wa.gov; douge@wsba.org; editor@isspress.com; inlocoparentis2dogs@hotmail.com; frank@heraldnet.com; fdiamondstone@seanet.com; ian@950kjr.com; gchittim@king5.com; sgarza@komotv.com; getjesse@king5.com; herbw@komonews.com; hoemann.tom@leg.wa.gov;
Cc: info@oah.wa.gov; institute@wsipp.wa.gov; jmccarthy@krem.com; info@jayinslee.com; jholtz@heraldnet.com; isaac@jimkastama.com; jirius@gmail.com; jkress2@hrsa.gov; joe@joemcdermott.org; mashburn29@msn.com; John.Elwood@usdoj.gov; john.g.malcolm@usdoj.gov; johnw@rutherford.org; jtaylor@king5.com; rbaker@co.stevens.wa.us; pat@skokandmonasmith.com; Judge_Samuel_Alito@njb.uscourts.gov; rbsanders@aol.com; lvancise@nwcn.com; ln_thompson5@hotmail.com; Luis.Moscoso@leg.wa.gov; mail@sos.wa.gov; Maria_Cantwell@cantwell.senate.gov; marko@markoliias.com; maryhelen.roberts@leg.wa.gov; mmillman@kirotv.com; mjung@king5.com; mornings@komo4news.com; newstips@king5.com; nick@nickharper.org; paul.d.clement@usdoj.gov; pdc@pdc.wa.gov; problemsolvers@komo4news.com; questions@wsba.org; RaderR@cafc.uscourts.gov; MaryLou.Dickerson@leg.wa.gov; rob@robmckenna.org; ross@rosshunter.com; sabre7us@yahoo.com; snorth@heraldnet.com; seattlekingcountynaacp@gmail.com; seattlepostglobe@yahoo.com; seattlerockscene@gmail.com; sodonnell@komonews.com; supreme@courts.wa.gov; tips@q13fox.com; tips@komo4news.com; TribalLawyer@hotmail.com; victims@fear.org; voice9696@comcast.net;
Date: Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:33 PM
Dear Members of the Media, Justice System & various state & private agencies,
My name is Brandia Taamu, I am the victim of NUMEROUS violations of my civil rights & a very malicious prosecution beyond all understanding & belief. Almost 875,000.00 spent to prosecute me for a 1000.00 misdemeanor. (Possibly more as that is only my rough estimate & we are STILL in litigation going on for 22 months & almost a hundred combined court appearances!)
Because of all that has happened to me I started to investigate other corrupt agencies & people & what I found was astounding. Some of you I have given the evidence to, only 2 of you have acknowledged it, the rest of you either don’t know about it or have completely ignored it. I think you can check with the city of Everett to confirm that I will not, & do not just shut up & go away.
I have posted stories on my blogs & sent a lot of them forward to the appropriate agencies & NOTHING has been done. I now understand WHY there is the level of corruption in our Government that there is: Because no one does anything
1) Tim Rasmussen the Stevens County Prosecutor was being investigated for alleged fraud in regards to his charity, lawyers were donating to another charity for a sweeter deal, & he lied & said his charity had nothing to do with the one they were donating to, the money was in fact being sent to that charity which the Washington state AG has dinked for fraudulent business practices down to an agency called Versacare, which is the 7th Day Adventist Blanket charity. I sent the proof to the Washington State Bar Association, & they did NOTHING, as a matter of fact they cleared him of all wrong doing! He is now so bold that he freely admits on the bottom of his charity page that he is an affiliate of Children’s Care International!!! So it seems to me as long as he keeps paying his Bar Dues he will be able to get away with anything, & they will clear him everytime.

2) Ginger Luke & her Husband Jakob Lueck’s Pet Rescue Scam & Prior Bad Acts of Animal Abuse. Ginger & Jakob have been convicted of animal cruelty abuse, neglect & illegal transport, just recently Jakob Lueck was busted for a major Pot Grow Operation, & in the charging documents I found out that one of the first customers on his “List” is the animal control officer I am having trouble with. I will be starting litigation against her as well as she, the officer & their friend Rose Adams all started this garbage. She has WAY too many properties she’s been using charity money meant for the dogs to buy it with, upwards of 20 different properties, she doesn’t claim most of her sales & has been kicked out of Petco, Petsmart & just about every other store in this state because of her practices.

3) Snohomish County Jail deaths. So 6 people have died here & yet Snohomish County is still ALLOWED to do it’s own investigations, & send the bodies to their own morgue which has been plagued by a plethera of problems as well. Is anyone going to pick up the ball on this one or is it going to be swept under the rug?

4) Thurston County Rescue “Scheme” AKA Scam. This is by far the sickest most disgusting use of power & funding that I have seen. Cop goes out & investigates people for animal cruelty, take the people’s animals, get donations from the public & the county, ask the judge at the people’s hearings for 10 to 20K & when the case is over they sell the animals to slaughter, or if you call in to ask for help from the agency they take your animals too. Cop is married to the lady who started the rescue, & the head of it now is also the head of the County shelter, all of the expert witnesses are either family friends or on the board of the rescue. Everyone is making money, lawyers, judges, court, probation, vets, rescue, shelter, all riding the gravy train of animal suffering.

5) Taamu V The City of Everett & the Everett Animal Control. My case has gone on for 22 months with 94 violations of state & federal laws, with a cost to taxpayers of close to 874K to prosecute me for a 1K misdemeanor, in Municipal Court, they took my animals & showed up with them at the shelter almost 6 hours later with one bleeding from his rectum, another having seizures, and another bloody, hypothermic & missing her perfect teeth. I have not seen them in 22 months, almost 2 yrs I will never get back with my senior animals & they threw away my one dogs body after they desecrated him in violation of my Native beleifs & customs, they have thrown me in jail for being 8 minutes late asking a 5K bail on a 1k misdemeanor, the jude gave me 10 times the sentence that was requested after I was found guilty because I was NOT allowed an expert witness, or ANY witnesses, & a jury of my peers. My case is so convoluted that I had to make a web page, a blog & a radio show to cover it all. Now Snohomish County has joined in their harassment, along with the City Attorney & death threats from the city’s witnesses, as well as hundreds of emails & posting on an internet board called Craigslist

I don’t understand WHY none of you have done anything about any of this! I know the ACLU told me that unless media was involved they couldn’t do anything, the Dept of Justice is just passing me around with promises to help & doing NOTHING, the only one of you that has done something is KOMO4 news that reported on a dog that the Everett Shelter murdered, unless it has something to do with Aaron Reardon’s wanker the Everett Herald is not going to do any stories telling the truth about this shelter. Senator Maria Cantwell is currently trying to help, the Judicial commission is actually doing an investigation, the Medical “Quality” Assurance Board is obviously too challenged to read their own WAC’s, the Bar… yeah they have done what they will continue to do: Nothing.
The ridiculous part is that all the stories on my blog, show & page ALL have documentation to back them up, I have proof, none of my mediums are blocked or hidden, they are there for the public -including you- to see, to act upon, to do something about but as of yet nothing has been done. I may be autistic, & I understand the challenges in understanding me sometimes, but I am fairly sure I am dealing with college educated people who can easily understand what I am saying. I don’t care if I don’t hear from most of you, I don’t care if you want to take credit for the stories or investigation, that is not why I am doing this. I would just like SOMEONE to do SOMETHING
Brandia Taamu

The reason you can not beat an abused child…

My friend was crying & screaming because she got passed up for a promotion that she worked hard for & that she honestly deserved. Although I sympathized with her & she was truly distraught I didn’t understand why she was so upset…. In her anger at my lack of understanding she said “Oh what the hell do you know, you never had a good life, you’ve been let down & backstabbed by everyone you have ever trusted & you’ve learned to expect to be let down”

Ya & so what’s your point?

I let her say what she said in her anger & just simply said “I still love you & we both know you deserved the promotion but you may do well to realize that you don’t always get what you want or deserve, life is like that sometimes.”

That got me to thinking about me, about my life, about who I am & how I approach life. She was right to a point, but also more wrong then she could have ever known. I still have a very gentle loving soul, & I still want to believe that people are good, that there can be joy in life. For every 10 times I have been hurt, let down or backstabbed, there is that ONE time when I find a person to believe in, when I find out that my trust was well placed. In my mind that makes it all worth it.

People that I have shared my childhood with have always lamented about how horrible it was & it was, but it also made me who I am, & I truly honestly love myself, a very rare thing in this world today. I have not always been successful or right but I have always gotten back up on my feet & tried again, I have never let life beat me. I get depressed, even suicidal, just recently because of all of this crap with the Everett Animal Control, & my dogs I was hospitalized for trying to drive myself off a cliff: as my foot was bearing down on the gas pedal all of a sudden a screaming thought came into my head: If you do this they will win. I hit the brakes & called my husband because there is also the matter of my 7 children & 10 grandchildren, the kids are grown & on their own but the funny thing is they still need me, the grand kids have so much to learn, & I still have so much more to accomplish in life.

In order to survive I developed certain coping mechanisms, little did I know I would need them to survive my adulthood. I honestly believe I would be a horrible person if I had not developed those coping skills & outlook on life. I am very proud of who I have become, of what I have done for my children, & for other people & animals. I have made lots of mistakes but I have always learned from them & moved on, I don’t do everything right but I do try to do it better the next time.

Yes I have horrid dark thoughts, I have days I want to give up & die but I’m still here & yes there are days I am pissed about it, there are days when I wish I didn’t have the life I had but I did & no amount of want or wishes can change it. I have been royally screwed over, my animals are now being held hostage by a bunch of people who’s ONLY power is to hold them.They even tried to act like they wanted to give them back, if you all remember they gave me an offer to return them if I would drop my tort claim, but the conditions they put down would’ve never have gotten them back to me & I would’ve lost any chance I had at getting any retribution. They have had 15 months to do the right thing & give them back to me, & dismiss all this stupid crap but their little egos just won’t let them. Honestly I think they have killed most of my animals or most of them which is why they have to put up this wall of bullcrap…. I live with that every day, there is NO WAY I can walk away from this now, no way in hell.

Yes it breaks my heart, yes it is not fair, it is not right, but it is what it is. The one institution I trusted & had faith in, the courts: I found out they were corrupt, okay, not good but I was also raised by the likes of Dave Riechart, Gene Doeman, Ken Conder, Larry Gross, Jack Meduna, Marylin Brenneman, & so many other detectives, judges & prosecutors who ARE good, who are honest, who are NOT corrupt. I had counselors like Bill Camp, Probation officers like Mr Bates, most of the Seattle Vice Squad , & Green River Task force up my butt around the corner & to the left as a teen keeping me in line, & on occasion kicking my butt & handing it to me. I have always had people in my life to look up to, my hero as a young adult was Alva Long, now he was a renegade if ever there was one. If he was still alive I guarantee the City of Everett would be one hurting unit, I would’ve had my animals back that day & we’d be in Federal Court right now kicking their asses… but the Alva Longs in this world are few & far between, there are not many people who are willing to fight for what is right, there are not hardly any people who will go against the crowd & stand up for the truth, that is the sad reality.Most people are too afraid to even do the right thing…

People can say whatever the hell they like about Dave Riechart the Congressman but I know him as a human being, as a cop, as a person. He, McMillan, Jensen, Meduna, Doeman, & a few others are the ONLY people who cared when those girls were coming up missing, they were the only one’s who even noticed. If it wasn’t for them Gary Ridgeway would still be killing at will.

I remember when I used to hitchhike everywhere, pretty much hitchhiked around the country, one day I caught a ride with a guy in a VW & I was so stupid, this old man is asking me for a “date”, now why the hell would I want to “date” someone as old as my grandpa? Right about the time I was trying to explain to the guy about how I felt our age difference was a big no no for me Jack Meduna was on motorcycle patrol, he pulled us over & he was just screaming at me about hitchhiking & the guy was about to piss himself when I said well geez I was just trying to get a ride & I’ve got you yelling at me & this guy who’s old enough to fart dust asking me if I want to date him, forget you both & I started walking. He pulled up next to me & explained what a “date” was & all kinds of other things & gave me bus fare & told me to quit hitchhiking. I never did again after that.

Shortly thereafter Guenter Mannhalt took me in at the Donut Shop downtown, I worked, went to school, got into fights, believe it or not they used to call me “Joe Lewis” I was a very good fighter, because of the rage I had inside of me, then I went into a foster home once Guenter was locked up with 3 to 4 gay men depending on who was in town. They got me through school, & taught me how to be a good human being.

I have also had to deal with the likes of my step-father, George Freeman, from the infamous Monostary a nightclub of horrors that he used to lure young boys & abuse them & then to have to find out that the infamous strip club owner was my grandfather’s cousin, so my “Uncle”… I accidentally got the leader of the Jamaican Posse released from Federal Prison, my family married me off to a guy who was 20 yrs older than me & to get them “back” I married the biggest loser American Samoa has ever produced who ended up getting my house, all my money & everything I owned taken away including my kids for a little while because he didn’t pay his taxes to the IRS & he had about 10 other women he was sleeping with calling CPS on me pretty much every day, I got my kids back once I proved the truth, but never got anything else back, but I got what mattered!

I have had my back broken twice I was paralyzed the first time & I was also fighting cancer, I have lost a baby when he was young, I lost my twin at 11 yrs of age, & lost my real father 15 yrs ago, (but at least I found him & got close to him) I was almost murdered 12 yrs ago & literally had to have my whole face reconstructed, & I had a stroke at 40 yrs of age… Just to name some of the trials I have faced head on & overcome.

It all comes down to this: Kids who were abused growing up learn to cope in many ways, the one’s who are successful & don’t end up dead, on drugs or behind bars are the one’s who are the most equipped to deal with life, even the ones who end up on drugs or in prison have infinitely more tools to cope & succeed than a kid who’s life has been relatively easy.

You screw with the bull & you’re going to get the horns when you screw with a childhood abuse survivor, they survived much worse then most people can ever imagine. A child who has survived night after night of fear & terror, who has learned how to negotiate around someone who is unpredictable at best, & can still go out in the world & put on a smile, yeah… There’s not much you can throw their way & put a dent in them, they’re already dented. Even if they occasionally lose a battle they are sure to win the war


wordpress visitor

Rose Adams Beutler Moon.

This is the beauty of this case finally being over at the Municipal level!!! I can finally tell you about these people, who they are, what they have done, & what they are capable of…

So let’s start with the city’s main witness. Rose Marie, Landers, Beutler, Adams, or Moon or any variation of the above, her boyfriends name is George Beutler. She has over 17 evictions that I have found so far since 1990 in King & Snohomish County, she has multiple issues where she tried to sue George’s family in Thurston County to take over his mother’s Estate, land & money before the woman even hit the grave. She sold a child in Florida, she lost 2 more to the state for physically & mentally abusing them, she claims to be “sanctioned by HSUS” claims to be a representative for several rescue groups, she claims to be a rescuer, who spends 1000’s every year saving dogs.

Here is a small sampling of her run in with the law, evictions & of her getting protection orders against all the people she has screwed over in the past few years

A man I talked to said she is every landlord’s nightmare… She files extensions, notices, replies, motions & makes the owner go to court for as long as possible & knows every delay tactic in the world. She is very adept at using the court systems to violate other people’s rights. It took her last landlord almost 5 months to get rid of her even after she had not paid the rent for well over 4 months, but since her SSI is not attachable none of these people can ever recover their money even if they “win” in court, she knows this & has been using it to her benefit for well over 2 decades.

Her new alias is Moon, her maiden name is Landers,  George’s last name is Beutler, & her ex husband is Adams

Adams, Rose Petitioner Kcdc-east Div (sho) 95-000843 07-05-1995 2

Adams, Rose Respondent Sno Co-everett Div 97-311AH 08-26-1997 3

Adams, Rose Appellant Coa, Division I 506374 06-19-2002 4

Adams, Rose Defendant Snohomish Superior 00-2-09388-6 12-06-2000 5

Adams, Rose Respondent Sno Co-everett Div 97-171AH 05-22-1997 7

Adams, Rose Defendant Snohomish Superior 05-2-10520-6 Available 08-02-2005 8

Adams, Rose Defendant Snohomish Superior 98-2-09032-2 12-02-1998 9

Adams, Rose Defendant Snohomish Superior 09-2-11839-4 12-18-2009 10

Adams, Rose Defendant Thurston Superior 08-2-01621-5 Available 07-08-2008 11

Adams, Rose Plaintiff Thurston County Dist 27974 07-29-2008 12

Adams, Rose Petitioner King Co Superior Ct 95-2-17127-3 07-07-1995 13

Adams, Rose Petitioner Kcdc-east Div (sho) 95-000841 07-05-1995 14

Adams, Rose Petitioner Kcdc-east Div (sho) 95-000842 07-05-1995 15

Adams, Rose Appellant Coa, Division I 506366 06-19-2002 16

Adams, Rose Defendant Snohomish Superior 07-2-07370-0 Available 09-07-2007 17

Adams, Rose Defendant Snohomish Superior 01-2-01649-9 Available 01-08-2001 18

Adams, Rose Defendant Snohomish Superior 10-2-02911-5 Available 02-24-2010

Adams Rose M Petitioner King Co Superior Ct 89-2-13774-7 07-17-1989 2

Adams, Rose M Petitioner Kcdc-east Div (sho) 95-000749 06-12-1995 3

Adams, Rose M Petitioner Kcdc-east Div (sho) 95-001200 09-13-1995 4

Adams, Rose M Plaintiff King Co Superior Ct 97-2-16445-1 06-30-1997 5

Adams, Rose M Petitioner King Co Superior Ct 90-2-02137-8 01-29-1990 6

Adams, Rose M Petitioner Pierce Co Superior 93-3-01866-4 04-19-1993 7

Adams, Rose M Petitioner King Co Superior Ct 90-2-13305-2 07-03-1990 8

Adams, Rose M Petitioner King Co Superior Ct 91-2-19788-1 09-10-1991 9

Adams, Rose M Respondent Snohomish Superior 95-2-05009-1 07-05-1995 11

Adams, Rose M Petitioner King Co Superior Ct 95-2-18323-9 07-26-1995 12

Adams, Rose M Petitioner Kcdc-east Div (sho) 91-009057 09-06-1991 13

Adams, Rose M Defendant Seattle Municipal Ct 65919 06-06-1991 14

Adams, Rose M Defendant Seattle Municipal Ct 201656 06-22-1994 15

Adams, Rose M Petitioner Sno Co-south Div U09-00053 03-18-2009 16

Adams, Rose M Petitioner Sno Co-south Div U09-00054 03-19-2009 17

Adams, Rose M Defendant Pierce Co District 1ZT102126 12-01-2011 19

Adams, Rose M Et Vir Petitioner Sno Co-south Div A95-00268 09-28-1995 21

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Snohomish Superior 93-2-04928-3 08-31-1993 22

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Sno Co-south Div C00087109 07-25-2005 23

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Sno Co-south Div 165176 02-16-1993 24

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Sno Co-south Div C00039284 11-07-2000 25

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Sno Co-south Div C00011544 09-27-2004 26

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Sno Co-south Div C00011543 09-27-2004 27

Adams, Rose Marie Respondent Sno Co-everett Div U04-00671 04-22-2004 28

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Kcdc-east Div (sho) J00009876 02-16-1990 29

Adams, Rose Marie Petitioner Sno Co-everett Div 97-207AH 06-16-1997 30

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Sno Co-everett Div PC04-2218 08-25-2004 31

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Sno Co-south Div C00087110 07-25-2005 32

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Kcdc-east Div (sho) J00046326 12-12-1989 33

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Kcdc-east Div (sho) J00041398 12-12-1989 34

Adams, Rose Marie Petitioner Sno Co-south Div A99-00063 03-31-1999 35

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Sno Co-south Div C00036999 12-29-1999 36

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Kirkland Municipal XY0073502 01-19-2010 37

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Sno Co-evergreen Div XY0026677 02-01-2010 38

Adams, Rose Marie Petitioner Sno Co-south Div D03-00170 10-24-2003 39

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Sno Co-everett Div 1095A10FE 05-07-2010 40

Adams, Rose Marie Petitioner Sno Co-south Div A96-00261 10-16-1996 41

Adams, Rose Marie Petitioner Sno Co-south Div A96-00260 10-16-1996 42

Adams, Rose Marie Petitioner Sno Co-south Div A96-00258 10-16-1996 43

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Everett Municipal IN0128726 12-01-2010 44

Adams, Rose Marie Respondent Sno Co-everett Div U11-00015 01-21-2011 45

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Lynnwood Municipal I00168820 01-08-2009 46

Adams, Rose Marie RESPONDENT Thurston Superior 08-2-30502-1 07-29-2008 48

Adams, Rose Marie PETITIONER Thurston Superior 08-2-30628-1 09-12-2008 49

Adams, Rose Marie PETITIONER Snohomish Superior 01-2-00338-9 03-12-2001 50

Adams, Rose Marie RESPONDENT Thurston Superior 07-2-30559-6 08-09-2007 51

Adams, Rose Marie PETITIONER Thurston Superior 08-2-30308-7 05-09-2008 52

Adams, Rose Marie PETITIONER Snohomish Superior 10-2-00835-5 06-07-2010 53

Adams, Rose Marie PETITIONER Thurston Superior 08-2-30590-0 08-29-2008 54

Adams, Rose Marie PETITIONER Snohomish Superior 01-2-00339-7 03-12-2001 55

Adams, Rose Marie PETITIONER Snohomish Superior 04-2-00445-2 04-20-2004 56

Adams, Rose Marie PETITIONER Thurston Superior 08-2-30627-2 Available 09-12-2008 57

Adams, Rose Marie PETITIONER Snohomish Superior 01-2-00337-1 03-12-2001 58

Adams, Rose Marie DEFENDANT Snohomish Superior 05-1-01959-4 07-29-2005 59

Adams, Rose Marie PETITIONER Thurston Superior 08-2-30307-9 05-09-2008 60

Adams, Rose Marie Defendant Everett Municipal CR0081455 04-02-2008 61

Adams, Rose Marie Petitioner Sno Co-south Div U10-00012 01-19-2010 62

Adams, Rose Marie Petitioner Sno Co-south Div U10-00011 01-19-2010 63

Adams, Rose Respondent Thurston County Dist 95-293HAR 08-23-1995 64


Here is the results of her psychological profile according to several mental health care professionals. Please note she abuses her children & George, & then blames them for all of her troubles, also PLEASE NOTE that all of this… This is what the prosecutor & judge were trying to say about me, so evidently they read the case as well. It was absolutely scripted, right along with saying I was on SSI disability when it was her who was & still is on it.

Dr. Wagner diagnosed Adams with antisocial personality disorder, finding her to be hostile and with little insight into the events involving her children.Adams also displayed features of narcissistic personality disorder and borderline personality disorder.  Adams generally blamed “the system” for her children’s behavior and emotional difficulties.  According to Dr. Wagner, it is difficult to treat individuals with a similar profile because they tend to blame others.Dr. Wagner, who diagnosed Adams with an antisocial personality disorder, noted that during the psychological evaluation, Adams frequently became angry and raised her voice, cursing and going off on tangential topics. Adams dominated the conversation whenever Beutler was present and frequently abused him verbally.  Despite her acknowledgement at the time of the agreed dependency order that there had been extreme family conflict and inappropriate discipline, Adams blamed X.X., Beutler, and “the system” for the family’s difficulties, and characterized X.X. as manipulative and dishonest. Based on her evaluation, Adams’ inability to control her anger, lack of insight, poor prognosis for treatment, and failure to benefit from many years of services, X.X.’s strong desire to remain in her father’s home, and X.X.’s expressed fear of Adams, Other State witnesses reached similar conclusions.  Ellis Amdur, a
child mental health specialist, interviewed Adams in conjunction with an assessment of X.X.’s placement with her father.  During the interview, Adams asserted that all of X.X.’s allegations were false and blamed X.X. for many of the things that had happened during the dependency. Adams denied any personal responsibility.Dr. Bramhall diagnosed Adams with a bipolar II disorder, “characterized by alternating cycles of hypomania and depression and recently mixed states.” During the interview, Adams insisted that prior CPS referrals had all been based on deliberate lies.  Dr. Bramhall concluded that Adams’ inability to control her anger prevented her from forming significant attachments with her children and setting appropriate limits. Leila Copeland testified that she provided in-home parenting services for Adams for approximately 18 months.  Copeland concluded that Adams had “minimal” insight into the effect of her actions on others.

But Rose went on to abuse the system even further. Now it is her who is calling CPS & making false allegations, I sat right in her living room while she called on her ex son in law, & his girlfriend, I watched her call every hospital in the area & tell them he was a drug addict & was only trying to get drugs so to not give him any, I watched her abuse George without mercy, I watched her post lies on line about her best buddy, postings I was getting blamed for. I’ll have the craigslist subpoena soon to show the proof of this but all it takes is common sense: Every since I had her craigslist shut down there have been no more postings about this rescue with that story line about fostering, there have been no more posting for her looking for the son the state took from her.

Now she is trying to get 40 dogs up here from California no doubt in conjunction with Christine James & her other little buddy.

If you look at the court case in bold up above you will see it is for 3 gross misdemeanors, for dangerous dogs running at large, & 3 misdemeanors for failure to show license, the way she got them dropped is to create a false claim against me, & lie under oath in a court of law.

Granted it was a Kangaroo Court, & the Judge & the prosecutor were going to screw me anyway,

Nevermind that I didn’t get to enter any of my own evidence, or get any witnesses to actually testify,

I didn’t get an expert witness, I didn’t get most of my discovery I requested, & during that time the prosecutor LIED and called Animal Control on me, & had this twat file false police reports against me.

Now she will tell you she single handedly shut down the Rene Roske puppy mills… but there is more to the story & now that I am actually digging into it it seems like there was something dirty going on there as well…

I got an email from some man stating he had seen an emaciated dog, a rottie or a dobie at a “friends” house, I was busy working on something else so I forwarded the info onto Rose who I was told had ties to the Snohomish County prosecutor, it seems she used that email to make friends with all of them so she could get in there & cause trouble, instead of simply forwarding it on to the Snohomish County authorities so she could interject herself into the situation, & that is all you seen & heard through this whole case was Rose claiming she had found the info , that she was sanctioned by HSUS, that she was a rescue representative, by her doing that she left those animals in harms way for months so she could grab a few minutes on camera, IF ANYTHING SHE SAID WAS TRUE… Now i am left to wonder, she has worked with the City of Everett Animal Shelter before and all the they did was lie, so what else have they lied about? Who else have they lied about?

wordpress visitor

One year ago today… You took my life.

One year ago today, I was sitting in my car with my doggies, & my kitty cat. I was holding George my terminally ill dog & coming to terms with the fact that the kindest thing to do was to take him to the vet & let him cross over, he had been on pain management for a couple of days & it didn’t seem to be helping. he was giving me little Georgie kisses, & as he looked into my eyes I promised him I would let him go on Friday & take him to be blessed & wrapped at the river where my twin brother died so that he could watch over his soul & that by the water he may be able to cross back over to come back to me again.

Humans are stupid, they like the feeling of being high, dogs not so much, so pain management is a last resort, for me it was finances, I didn’t get paid til Friday. George was always a very stoic little old man, had his glands not swollen I never would’ve known he had cancer. All I can think of is that night, he didn’t want to sleep with me, he gave me a kiss & pawed at a kennel so I got up & opened it for him but kept my hand on him for the night, it was the first time he did not lay by my side since the day he came to my home almost 2 yrs earlier. Soffia & Misty took turns sleeping with him & me that night.

In my grief I never could’ve guessed that in the morning a fat ugly evil little pig would come & take my animals, little did I know that the next day they would show up at the shelter almost 7 hours after they were taken from me bleeding from the rectum, unable to walk, bloody, missing teeth, having seizures & hypothermic. What did they do to George to make him bleed from his butt & be unable to walk? Why was my Soffia, hypothermic, bloody & missing teeth??? What the FRICK is wrong with that stupid pig faced b*tch to do something like to helpless animals, what the frick is wrong in the prosecutors mind to prosecute me & protect her KNOWING FULL WELL HE DOESN’T HAVE A CASE.

Just take a look at her little pig face… Oh & that little pit bull she is dragging in has probably been beaten & maced & was grateful for the release of death, yes it was killed, for being a pit bull

George lived for 12 miserable years in a puppy mill, he was a victim of some woman’s greed, then he became the victim of that stupid b*tches hatred & prejudice

It takes a special kind of monster to do this to him… Who would do something like this to an innocent helpless creature? When you look at these pictures remember that was a living breathing feeling thinking creature who was loved, who was cherished, who had worth. A simple blood test would’ve confirmed lymphoma & that was already verified & she is not a licensed forensic vet, she just did this for “funsies”

Here is my precious little Soffia, before & after… What you DON’T see because they are only giving us black & white photos, is the dark coloring around Soffie’s mouth is BLOOD, & you will notice that poor little Libby looks totally terrified, & George at the bottom of the other picture is unable to walk. Why didn’t they take pictures of them when they took them from me? THEY DID BUT THEY AREN’T GIVING THEM TO US BECAUSE THEY WILL SHOW WARM DRY NON BLOODY DOGS. Please also keep in mind they said Soffie’s fur was all matted but ALL YOU SEE ARE RINGLETS not mats, if she was matted she would’ve been lumpy, but you can DISTINCTLY see all the curls in her hair after they probably tried to drown her

The same woman that can smile in the face of one animal, & take it’s life from them, no matter how much they cry, no matter how hard they resist, she fills her needle up with the pink liquid & takes their lives, for nothing more than being my dogs, or for being pitbulls, then she goes off to lunch, a laughs her day away. In one day she KILLED 82 cats, a woman after Hitler’s heart…

You might also want to note that the dog above is a pit bull so she smiles for the picture but when the camera was gone she will end it’s life, a puppy with so much love to give. Just gone.

It has always been strange to me that most of the pictures they take for the local papers are with pit bulls or terriers, that they are going to kill… but as a friend suggested they are probably trophy pictures so they can look at that & smile knowing they killed that one too.

But here… Here is the biggest JOKE of all, the Oath of David C Mitchell that he took on 1/6/2010 Exactly 1 yr before they stole my animals. Notice he was late, laughing & stuttering. Yep really funny…

OATH OF OFFICE Superior Court Judge Joe Wilson administered the oaths of office to Municipal Court Judges Timothy O’Dell and David Mitchell.


Sorry I could not find a picture of him or Mr Fisher as was requested. I will continue looking, though

So if you were a jury & you seen this WHAT WOULD YOU DO?

I have 7 yrs+ of vet records or my dogs, none were underweight, none were starving, none were abused, none were sick except for George… Whereas while they have been in the care of Everett, they have been given medications known to kill that certain breed, they have gotten tape worms which means they had fleas, they have had those stupid fricking b*tches, animal control officers treating my dogs, probably taking them around a corner & beating the sh*t out of them again, Soffie had to be brought in for stitches, for “lacerations” whether she made it or not I don’t know, I don’t know if she got run over, or attacked, or beaten, Hoki is in full on epilepsy after being seizure free for over a year, Libby is having outbreaks & reactions to the meds they are giving her, no one has heard from my cat, & they won’t tell me what they did with Lilly kitty, so who knows if any of them are still alive, the city of everett vet did an unauthorized necropsy on George, when she is not accredited to do so & then took pictures of her playing in his guts, not to mention while he was alive for 5 days in that putrid hellhole they were only giving him a QUARTER tablet of tramadol, which is about 1/4 of what he should have had ONLY ONCE A FRICKING DAY, so they just let him suffer in pain after they did God knows what to him in the hours they had him, we know he was bleeding from his butt, we know he was unable to walk.

None of my dogs were abused, abandoned, injured, or neglected, we were just sleeping in a car until we could get our house ready which came up 7 days after they were taken, 2 days after they murdered & mutilated George. ALL BECAUSE OF THE B*TCHES PICTURED ABOVE, & THIS B*TCH. IF YOU EVER SEE THIS WOMAN RUN FOR YOUR LIFE

IT WAS HER LIES & LORI TRASK, CARLON, LEMAIRE WHATEVER THE FRICK HER NAME IS THIS YEAR PREJUDICE &  the dirty corrupt prosecutor & judge who thought I was just going to take the illegal seizure of my animals, the torture of them & myself just lying down… well evidently NONE OF YOU KNOW THE POWER & THE FURY OF A MOTHER’S LOVE.

Happy One Year Anniversary to you, just remember

EVERY DOG HAS IT’S DAY… BUT EVERY DOG HAS IT’S DOG. My new Mantra is do unto other what they do unto you…

Remember this, now that I know I don’t have to have an attorney & that I can now represent myself, we are going to have a ball in court, because everything you have done to my animals, & myself is going to be public knowledge, every law you have broken, every Constitutional law you have broken. You should just drop this matter & give me back my animals, I already sent the motion & I have given you 72 hours, & remember since you used part of this blog in my records you have to use it all, so the jury will see this, they will see all of it. If you don’t follow the law, drop the charges, & return my animals & property I have entire Communities coming to help me out. I have already sent them power of attorney to take over my matters in the event that you try to lock me up illegally again! I do not consent to your authority, I do not recognize your jurisdiction, I have rescinded all of my contracts made with you by way of duress per minas… But you already know this: Don’t you?

Oh & just try to sue me for this… I AM BROKE BECAUSE I CAN’T GO TO WORK OR GET A JOB BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN IN COURT 62 TIMES IN THE PAST YEAR. You will choke on your words & your deeds. I WELCOME a trial, or a call sometime between now & Monday to tell me when I can come & get my dogs, crates, & their meds.

***Oh Hey! For all of my readers out here, I got the tapes & someone is working on putting them up for me so you can hear this judge convict me before trial & then you can hear him say he didn’t say it. I put in a request for all 50 court appearances & someone is going to splice them all together so you can see what I have to go through almost every week, sometimes twice a week.


wordpress visitor

My Affidavit of Truth

Here is my Affidavit of Truth, REMEMBER when you walk into a courtroom, the Judge is NOT GOD, the Prosecutor is nothing more than YOUR public employee, they are not above the law, they have no real power over you, & you need to remind them of that. Especially if you are facing the kinds I am, they are NOTHING more than public trustees, whether they are elected, hired or contracted, you are NOT beholden to them, they are in fact beholden to you, it is your tax dollars that pay their wages. They are supposed to administer Justice, not their egos. Generally I strongly advocate respect for the courts & it’s officers. I was raised by Prosecutors, Judges, Cops & I know the difference between those who operate with integrity & those who don’t. If I had been in front of any one with any integrity this case would’ve been dismissed 10 months ago on lack of merit alone but again this is a clash of their precious ego’s….

I mean seriously WHO EVER HEARD OF 50 COURT APPEARANCES FOR A MISDEMEANOR CASE???? It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see this for what it is. I am going to be very interested in hearing their explanation in a Tort Trial, actually I wish I could be a fly on the proverbial wall when their Surety Company gets my notice. ALWAYS go after their bonds, once they can’t be bonded it doesn’t matter what the Bar does (or doesn’t do), or any state commission, if they can’t be bonded they can’t work.

In 3 days it will make 1 yr since I have seen my own animals… Someone is going to pay for this, with the ONLY things that mean anything to them, by them harassing & intimidating me, & violating just about every single “Right” I have as a Human Being, they have created their own little monster & then set it loose on themselves. They took my life, my liberty, my rights but worst yet my babies, so I will take their money & their power to abuse others the way they have gotten used to treating so many other people.



CITY OF EVERETT (A Municipal Corporation)






Affidavit of Truth

Comes now the Executor of the Estate of BRANDIA TAAMU, the true plaintiff in this matter before the court for which there is no cause. We are assuming that since there was no rebuttal to the Executor’s Directive or Appointment that the matter (which was sent on December 23rd 2011 at which time the city was given 72 hours to respond) is agreed upon by the court and that Ms Taamu’s Animals and Property are to be returned immediately, and that the court has disposed of the matter for which there is no cause. We have yet to receive any communication whether by email , mail or telephone that let’s us know when we can retrieve Ms Taamu’s Animals and Property and that payment of Ms Taamu’s Fee Schedule is forthcoming within 14 days of the filing of the Directive, the Appointment or the Fee Schedule. Nor have we received a copy of the Surety or Bond as requested for Judge David C Mitchell James D Iles, or Prosecutor Mike A Fisher.

We have also not received the City’s proof that they are a Plaintiff in the case and showing their own personal injuries, and as stated in the charging papers: The City is in fact a Municipal Corporation, not a flesh and blood human being. If it is in fact the City’s intent to proceed where there is no cause then let these Statements of Fact stand to be memorialized for Future Cause, Cause Ms Taamu can claim. The city has also failed to prove their standing & jurisdiction in the matter before the courts, nor has the exact Nature and Cause of the matter been established as the result of the refusal to disclose all discovery in the matter. This being the 3rd request which puts the City in default, since no rebuttal has been offered or made since you were put on notice. If not rebutted within 15 DAYS by lawful evidence to the contrary, this affidavit is at law evidence that the court has not joined the true party of interest and a default exists. Failure to present evidence to the contrary of the Affiants testimony, will be evidence that all parties stipulate to the facts herein as true, correct and complete. Wherefore the court should dismiss the case sua sponte for failure to join an indispensable party as such relieves the court of jurisdiction over the parties.

On January 6th 2011 the City of Everett’s agents did extorsively take Ms Taamu’s Animals and Property in collusion and under exaction, color of title, color of authority, and oppression. Denying Ms Taamu’s beneficial enjoyment of her property and animals and to initiate the matter before the court and did hereby bring a cause before the court against Ms Taamu In Invitum. Actus me invito factus, non est meus actus. An act done by me against my will, is not my act. At which time Ms Taamu was also denied access to her animals to have a vet examine them and were taken from Ms Taamu’s care, warm, safe and dry but showed up at the shelter some 5 to 7 hrs later, bleeding from the rectum, bloody, missing teeth, hypothermic, wet and having seizures. The property and animals as described

1) George-a 14yr old deceased American Eskimo Dog

2) Hoki- a 9yr old Australian Kelpie Dog

3) Soffia- a 12yr old German Schnauzer Dog

4) Misty- a 5yr old Toy Australian Shepherd Dog

5) Libby- a 3yr old Pomeranian mix Dog

6) Taz- a 6yr old Domestic Short hair Cat

7,8,9) All kennels, blankets, and medications also seized on the same day

On February 2nd the City of Everett did bring false charges against Ms Taamu listing themselves as a Municipal Corporation AND a Plaintiff but at no time showed any real personal injury to a flesh and blood person. Using Ms Taamu’s name BRANDIA ALIDA MAREA TAAMU to create a bond with which to make Capital gains for the City of Everett, which rightfully belong to the Estate of Ms Taamu.

On February 16th the City of Everett did force Ms Taamu into a contract with the city under intimidation, duress per minas, exaction, collusion, oppression, color of title, and color of authority* under the “Washington State Constitution”. Consensus facit legem. Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent. Article one of your constitution’s “Bill of Rights (Declaration of Rights)” states that “All political power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights. All men are born equally free and independent” and that therefore, all government of right originates from the people, and “is founded in consent”. This means that in regards to your society’s “statutes” or “ordinances”, consent is required. Ms Taamu does not consent to your governance. Ms Taamu was not nor has ever been a “resident” of your city. As a free woman Ms Taamu and her Estate take responsibility for her actions and will do no harm to others or their property. Since your agents are not acting by the consent of the governed, then they are acting cohercively. Extracting undisclosed consent by any means un-neccesary.

****Again as Executor of the Estate of BRANDIA TAAMU I remind all parties that signatures and contracts in Jus Penitendi, made by Ms Taamu and all agents acting in her behalf who had no real true vested interest in Ms TAAMU’S Estate or real authority to sign in Ms Taamu’s behalf were in fact rescinded. Under the facts that all signatures, agreements or contracts were null and void as their true nature was never disclosed.

Ms Taamu has by THIRD notice on this day rescinded her signature on all documents and revoked all city, county and state agents authority in all matters to do with her Estate and with the City of Everett’s cause # CRP003735. That is undeniable. We assert there is no cause and at no time with clear and sound mind did she agree with any of the matter in front of the court as evidenced by Ms Taamu’s repeated attempts at trying to resolve this matter under duress per minas* intimidation*, exaction*, collusion*, oppression*, color of title*, and color of authority* and absolute terror of retribution or the murder and deprivation of Ms Taamu’s animals. We do not recognize* you nor do we agree* to your governance

Let it also be known that at no time did Ms Taamu or her Estate enter in an agreement or contract with the Everett animal shelter nor it’s foster care system and there is no debt real or implied with either or. It was in fact the courts which entered into an agreement with the city of Everett animal shelter and all agents thereof. On April 6th 2011

February 16th set the stage for almost 50 additional court appearances, loss of liberty, and freedom for Ms Taamu, the false cause bringing Ms Taamu to financial and emotional ruin. This entire cause has been nothing more than a very thinly veiled attempt at usurpation, the denial of beneficial enjoyment of her own property, and subtraction under distress with clear intent ofDeforcement, disseisin, abatement, discontinuance, and intrusion. We submit that all parties would be remiss in their fiduciary duties to not consent to the law. Furthermore, Ms Taamu is NOT a city, state, government or public employee to which you are trying to apply your rules to. We charge that it is in fact the City and it’s actors who are in violations of it’s own laws as follows:





The taking of beasts or other personal property by way of pledge, to enforce the performance of something due from the party distrained upon. 3 Bl. Comm. 231. THE TAKING OF A DEFENDANT’S GOODS, IN ORDER TO COMPEL AN APPEARANCE IN COURT. Id. 2S0; 3 Steph. Comm. 301, 363. Also the thing taken by distraining, that which is seized to procure satisfaction.


Any unlawful conduct on the part of a person concerned in the administration of justice which is prejudicial to the rights of parties or to the right determination of the cause; as “misconduct of jurors,” “misconduct of an arbitrator.” The term is also used to express a dereliction from duty, injurious to another, on the part of one employed in a professional capacity, as an attorney at law, (Stage v. Stevens, 1 Denio [N. Y.] 267,) or a public officer, (State v. Leach, 60 Me. 58, 11 Am. Rep. 172.)


Deforcement Is where a man wrongfully holds lands to which another person is entitled. It therefore includes disseisin, abatement, discontinuance,and intrusion. Co. Litt. 2776, 3316; Foxworth v. White, 5 Strob. (S. C.) 115; Woodruff v.Brown, 17 N. J. Law, 2G9; Hopper v. Hopper, 21 N. J. Law, 543. But It is applied especially to cases, not falling under those heads, where the person entitled to the freehold has never had possession; thus, where a lord has a seignory, and lands escheat to him propter defectum sanguinis, but the seisin is withheld from him, this is a deforcement, and the personwho withholds the seisin is called a “deforceor.” 3 Bl. Comm. 172.In Scotch law. The opposition or resistance made to messengers or other public officers while they are actually engaged in the exercise of their offices. Ersk. lust. 4, 4, 32.


The act of a defaulter; misappropriation of trust funds or money held in any fiduciary capacity; failure to properly account for such funds. Usually spoken of officers of corporations or public officials. In re Butts (D. C.) 120 Fed. 970; Crawford v. Burke, 201 111. 581, 06 N. E. 833.Also set-off. The dimiuution of a debt or claim by deducting from it a smaller claim held by the debtor or payor. Iron Works v. Cuppey, 41 Iowa, 104; liouk v. Foley, 2 Pen.& W. (Pa.) 250; McDonald v. Lee, 12 La. 435.


In the rule that statutes should be so construed as to avoid ”inconvenience,” this means, as applied to the public, the sacrifice or jeopardizing of important public interests or hampering the legitimate activities of government or the transaction of public business, and, as applied to individuals, serious hardship or injustice. See Black, Iuterp. Laws, 102; Betls v. U. S., 132 Fed. 237, 05 C. C. A. 452.


Dispossession; a deprivation of possession; a privation of seisin; ausurpation of the right of seisin and possession, and an exercise of such powers and privileges of ownership as to keep out or displace him to whom these rightfully belong.3 Washb. Real Prop. 125; Probst v. Trustees, 129 U. S. 182, 9 Sup. Ct. 263, 32 L. Ed.642; Bond v. O’Gara, 177 Mass. 139, 58 N. E. 275, 83 Am. St. Rep. 265; Moody v.Fleming, 4 Ga. 115, 48 Am. Dec. 210; Clapp v. Bromagbam, 9 Cow. (N. Y.) 553; Washburnv. Cutter, 17 Minn. 368 (Gil. 335). When one man invades the possession of an- other, and by force or surprise turns him out of the occupation of his lands, this is termed a “disseisin,” being a deprivation of that actual seisin or corporal possession of the freehold which the tenant before enjoyed. In other words, a disseisin is said to be when one enters intending to usurp the possession, and to oust another from the freehold. To constitute an entry adisseisin, there must be an ouster of the freehold, either by taking the profits or by claiming the inheritance. Brown. According to the modern authorities, there seems to be no legal difference between the words “seisin” and “possession,” although there is a difference between the words”disseisin” and “dispossession;” the former meaning an estate gained by wrong and injury, whereas the latter may be by right or by wrong; the former denoting an ouster of the disseisee, or some act equivalent to it, whereas by the latter no such act is implied. Slater v. Rawson, 6 Mete. (Mass.) 439.


In criminal law. A term used to signify every considerable misdemeanor which has not a certain name given to it by law.. 3 Inst. 30. But more particularly and properly the term denotes either (1) a contempt against the sovereign, the government, or the courts of justice, including not only contempts of court, properly so called, but also all forms of seditious or disloyal conduct and lezemajesty; (2) maladministration of high public office, including peculation of the public funds; (3) neglect or light account made of a crime, that is, failure in the duty of a citizen to endeavor to prevent the commission of a crime, or, having knowledge of its commission, to reveal It to the proper authorities. See 4 Bl. Comm. 119- 120.


Duress by threats. The use of threats and menaces to compel a person, by the fear of death, or grievous bodily harm, as mayhem or loss of limb, to do some lawful act, or to commit a misdemeanor. 1 Bl. Comm. 130; 4 Bl. Comm. 30; 4 Steph. Comm. 83. See METUS


In English law. Every person commits a misdemeanor, punishable with a fine or imprisonment, who wrongfully uses violence to or intimidates any other person, or his wife or children, with a view to compel him to abstain from doing, or to do, any act which he has a legal right to do, or abstain from doing. (St. 38 & 39 Vict, c. 80,


Any oppression by color or pretense of right, and particularly the exaction by an officer of money, by color of his office, either when none at all is due, or not so much is due. or wen it Is not yet due. Preston v. Bacon, 4 Conn. 4S0.Extortion consists in any public officer unlawfully taking, by color of his office, from any person any money or thing of value that is not due to him. or more than his due.


The wrongful act of an officer or other person in compelling payment of a fee or reward for his services, under color of his official authority, where no payment Is due. Between “extortion” and “exaction” there is this difference: that in the former case the officer extorts more than his due, when something is due to him; in the latter, he exacts what is not his due, when there is nothing due to him. Co. Litt. 368.


That semblance or presumption of authority sustaining the acts of a public officer which is derived from his apparent title to the office or from a writ or other process in his hands apparently valid and regular. State v. Oates, 80 Wis. 634, 57 N. W. 290, 39 Am. St. Rep. 912; Wyatt v. Monroe, 27 Tex. 208.


The appearance, semblance, or simulacrum of title. Any fact, extraneous to the act or mere will of the claimant, which has the appearance, on its face, of supporting his claim of a present title to land, but which, for some defect, in reality falls short of establishing it. Wright v. Mattison, 18 How. 56, 15 L. Ed. 280; Cameron v. U. S


The misdemeanor committed by a public officer, who under color of his office, wrongfully inllicts upon any person any bodily harm, imprisonment, or other injury. 1 Russ. Crimes, 297; Steph. Dig. Crim. Law, 71. See U. S. v. Deaver (D. C.) 14 Fed. 597.


A deceitful agreement or compact between two or more persons, for the one party to bring an action against the other for some evil purpose, as to defraud a third party of his right Cowell. A secret arrangement between two or more persons, whose interests are apparently conflicting, to make use of the forms and proceedings of law in order to defraud a third person, or to obtain that which justice would not give them, by deceiving a court or it officers. Baldwin v. New York, 45 Barb. (N. Y.) 359; Belt v. Blackburn, 28 Md. 235; Railroad Co. v. Gay. 8G Tex. 571, 26 S. W. 599, 25 L. R. A. 52; Balch v. Beach, 119 Wis. 77, 95 N. W. 132.


An answer or plea is called “frivolous” when it is clearly insufficient on its face, and does not controvert the material points of the opposite pleading, and is presumably Interposed for mere purposes of delay or to embarrass the plaintiff. Ervvinv. Lowery, 64 N. C. 321; Strong v. Sproul, 53 N. Y. 499; Gray v. Gidiere, 4 Strob. (S. C.)442; Peacock v. Williams (C. C.) 110 Fed. 910.A frivolous demurrer has been defined to lie one which is so clearly untenable, or its insufficiency so manifest upon a bare inspection of the pleadings, that its character maybe determined without argument or research. Cottrill v. Cramer, 40 Wis. 558.Synonyms. The terms “frivolous” and “sham,” as applied to pleadings, do not mean the same thing. A sham plea is good on its face, but false in fact; it may, to all appearances, constitute a perfect defense, but is a pretence because false and because not pleaded in good faith. A frivolous plea may be perfectly true in its allegations, but yet is liable to be stricken out because totally insufficient in substance. Andrese v. Bandler(Sup.) 56 X. Y. Supp. 614; Brown v. Jenison, 1 Code R. N. S. (N. Y.) 157.


To fabricate evidence is to arrange or manufacture circumstances orindicia, after the fact committed, with the purpose of using them as evidence, and of deceitfully making them appear as if accidental or undesigned; to devise falsely or contrive by artifice with the intention to deceive. Such evidence may be wholly forged and artificial, or it may consist in so warping and distorting real facts as to create an erroneous impression in the minds of those who observe them and then presenting such impression as true and genuine.


In the Roman and civil law. A wrong or Injury: an offense; a violation of public or private duty.It will be observed that this word, taken in its most general sense, is wider in both directions than our English term “tort.” On the one hand, it includes those wrongful acts which, while directly affecting some individual or his property, yet extend in their injurious consequences to the peace or security of the community at large, and hence rise to the grade of crimes or misdemeanors. These acts were termed in the Roman law”public delicts:” while those for which the only penalty exacted was compensation to the person primarily injured were denominated “private delicts.” On the other hand, the term appears to have included injurious actions which transpired without any malicious intention on the part of the doer. Thus Pothier gives the name “quasi delicts” to the acts of a person who, without malignity, but by an inexcusable imprudence, causes an injury to another. Poth. Obi. 110. Rut the term is used in modern jurisprudence as a convenient synonym of “tort;” that is, a wrongful and injurious violation of a jus it. remor right available against all the world. This appears in the two contrasted phrases,”actions ex contractu” and “actions ex delicto.”Quasi delict. An act whereby a person, without malice, but by fault, negligence, or prudence not legally excusable, causes injury to another. Qui judex litem suam Jecit, being the offense of partiality or excess in thejudex, (juryman;) e. y., in assessing the damages at a ligure iu excess of the extremelimit permitted by the formula. Torts commuted by one’s agents (t y., stable-boys, shop-managers, etc.) in the course of their employment. Brown.


Lat. A delict, tort, wrong, injury, or offense. Actions ex dclicto are suchas are founded on a tort, as distinguished from actions on contract. Culpability, blameworthiness, or legal delinquency. The word occurs in this sense in the maxim, “In pari delicto inclior est conditio defendentis,” (which see.)A challenge of a juror propter delictum is for some crime or misdemeanor that affects his credit and renders him infamous. 3 Bl. Comm. .”03 ; 2 Kent, Comm. 241.


TORT. L. Fr. Of his own wrong. A stranger who takes upon him to act as an executor without any just authority is called an “executor of his own wrong,” (de son tort.) 2 Bl. Comm. 507; 2 Steph. Comm. 244.


L. Fr. Never executor. The name of a plea by which the defendant denies that he is an executor, as he is alleged to be; or that the plaintiff is an executor, as he claims to be.


The offense of withholding or withdrawing from another man what by law he is entitled to. There are various descriptions of this offense, of which the principal are as follows: (1) Subtraction of suit and services, which is a species of injury affecting a man’s real property, and consists of a withdrawal of (or a neglect to perform or pay) the fealty, suit of court, rent, or services reserved by the lessor of the land.


See FORESTALL.Forstellarius est pauperum depressor et totius coinmunitntis et patria; pub- llcusiaimicus. 3 Inst. 190. A forestaller is an oppressor of the poor, and a public enemy of the whole community and country.


A technical word used in indictments for extortion.It is a sufficient averment of a corrupt intent, in an indictment for extortion, to allege that the defendant “extorsively” took the unlawful fee. Leeman v. State, 35 Ark.438, 37 Am. Rep. 44.


L. Lat Where the bailiff of a lord distrains beasts or goods of another, and the lord forbids the bailiff to deliver them when the sheriff comes to make replevin, the owner of the cattle may demand satisfaction in placitum de vetito namio. 2 Inst 140; 2 BL Comm. 148. VETO 1205 VICAR


Any misfeasance or act of one man whereby another is injuriously treated or damnified. 3 Bl. Comm. 208. An injury or misfeasance to the person, property, or rights of another person, done with force and violence, either actual or implied in law. See Grunson v. State, 89 Ind. 530, 46 Am. Rep. 178; Southern Ity. Co. v. Harden, 101 Ga. 203, 28 S. E. 847; Blood v. Kemp, 4 Pick. (Mass.) 173; Toledo, etc., R. Co. v. McLaughlin, 03 111. 391; Agnew v. Jones, 74 Miss. 347, 23 South. 25; Hill v. Kimball. 70 Tex. 210, 13 S. W. 59, 7 L. R. A. 618. In the strictest sense, an entry on another’s ground, without a lawful authority, and doing some damage, however inconsiderable, to his real property. 3 Bl. Comm. 209. Trespass, in its most comprehensive sense, signifies any transgression or offense against the law of nature, of society, or of the country in which we live; and this, whether it relates to a man’s person or to his property. In its more limited and ordinary sense, it signifies an injury committed with violence, and this violence may be either actual or implied; and the law will imply violence though none is actually used, when the injury is of a direct and immediate kind, and committed on the person or tangible and corporeal property of the plaintiff. Of actual violence, an assault and battery is an instance; of implied, a peaceable but wrongful entry upon a person’s land. Brown. In practice. A form of action, at the common law, which lies for redress in the shape of money damages for any unlawful ipjury done to the plaintiff, in respect either to his person, property, or rights, by the immediate force and violence of the defendant.


A writ to the justices of the common bench for sending a record touching a recognizance, which the recognizor suggests was acknowledged by force and duress; that if it so appear the recognizance may be annulled. Reg. Orig. 183.


Against an unwilling party; against one not assenting. A term appliedto proceedings against an adverse party, to which he does not consent.


A reckless or malicious and intentional disregard of the property, rights, or safety of others, implying, actively, a licentious or contemptuous willingness to injure and disregard of the consequences to others, and, passively, more than mere negligence, that is, a conscious and Intentional disregard of duty. See Brasington v. South Bound R. Co., 02 S. C. 325, 40 S. E. 005, 89 Am. St. Rep. 905; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Webb, 97 Ala. 30S, 12 South. 374; Branch v. State, 41 Tex. 625; Harward v. Davenport, 105 Iowa, 592, 75 N. W. 4S7; Trauerman v. Lippincott, 39 Mo. App. 4S8; Everett v. Richmond & D. R. Co., 121 N. C. 519. 27 S. E. 991; Birmingham Ry. & El. Co. v. Pincltard, 124 Ala. 372, 26 South. 8S0. Reckless sport; willfully unrestrained action, running immoderately into excess. Cobb v. Bennett, 75 Pa. 330, 15 Am. Rep. 752. A licentious act by one man towards the person of another, without regard to his rights; as, for example, if a man should attempt to pull off another’s hat against his will, in order to expose him to ridicule, the offense would be an assault, and If he touched him It would amount to a battery. Bouvier. BL.LAW DICT.(2D ED.)


1) PUBLIC TRUSTEE: RCW 42.52.010 Definitions

“State officer” means every person holding a position of PUBLIC OFFICE in or under an executive, legislative, or judicial office of the state. “State officer” includes judges of the superior court, judges of the court of appeals, justices of the supreme court, members of the legislature together with the secretary of the senate and the chief clerk of the house of representatives, holders of elective offices in the executive branch of state government, chief executive officers of state agencies, members of boards, commissions, or committees with authority over one or more state agencies or institutions, and employees of the state who are engaged in supervisory, policy-making, or policy-enforcing work. For the purposes of this chapter, “state officer” also includes any person exercising or undertaking to exercise the powers or functions of a state officer.


A PUBLIC OFFICER, appointed to preside and to administer the law in a court of justice; the chief member of a court, and charged with the control of proceedings and the decision of questions of law or discretion. Todd v. U. S


The name of the PUBLIC OFFICER (in several states) who is appointed in each judicial district, circuit, or county, to conduct criminal prosecutions on behalf of the state or people. See People v. May, 3 Mich. 605; Holder v. State, 58 Ark. 473, 25 S. W. 279.


An employment on behalf of the government in any station or PUBLIC TRUST, not merely transient, occasional, or incidental. In re Attorneys’ Oaths, 20 Johns. (N. Y.) 493. The most frequent occasions to use the word arise with reference to a duty and power conferred on an individual by the government; and, when this is the connection, “public office” is a usual and more discriminating expression. It is a general rule that a judicial office cannot be exercised by deputy, while a ministerial one may. Waldo v. Wallace, 12 Ind. 569. “Office” Is frequently used in the old books as an abbreviation for “inquest of office,” (q. v.)


An obligation arising from contract of the parties or the operation of the law. Riddell v. Ventilating Co., 27 Mont. 44, 69 Pac. 241. That which the law requires to be done or forborne to a determinate person or the public at large, correlative to avested and coextensive right in such person or the public, and the breach of which constitutes negligence. Heaven v. Pender, 11 Q. B. Div. 506; Smith v. Clarke HardwareCo., 100 Ga. 163, 28 S. E. 73, 39 L. R. A. 607; Railroad Co. v. Ballentine, 84 Fed. 935, 28 C. C. A. 572


A bond given by a public officer, conditioned that he shall well and faithfully perform all the duties of the office. The term is sometimes made to include the bonds of executors, guardians, trustees, etc.


As occasionally used in statutes prescribing the qualifications of public officers, trustees, etc., this term means soundness of moral principle and character, as shown by one person dealing with others in the making and performance of contracts, and fidelity and honesty in the discharge of trusts; it is . synonymous with “probity,” “honesty,” and “uprightness.” In re Bau- quier’s Estate, 88 Cal. 302, 26 Pac. 178; In re Gordons Estate, 142 Cal. 125, 75 Pac. 672.


As used in bonds of public and private officers, this term imports not only honesty, but also a punctilious discharge of all the duties of the ofiice, requiring competence, diligence, and attention, without any malfeasance or nonfeasance, aside from mere mistakes. State v. Chadwick, 10 Or. 408; Hoboken v. Evans, 31 N. J. Law,343; Harris v. Hanson, 11 Me. 245 ; American Bank v. Adams, 12 Pick. (Mass.) 300;Union Bank v. Clossey, 10 Johns. (N. Y.) 273; Perry v. Thompson, 10 N. J. Law, 73.


THE PERSON APPOINTED, OR REQUIRED BY LAW, TO EXECUTE A TRUST; one in whom an estate, interest, or power is vested, under an express or implied agreement to administer or exercise it for the benefit or to the use of another.


Two or more relations, offices, functions, or rights which cannot naturally, or may not legally, exist in or be exercised by the same person at the same time, are said to be incompatible. Thus, the relations of lessor and lessee of the same land, in one person at the same time, are incompatible. So of trustee and beneficiary of the same property. See People v. Greeu, 4G How. Prac.


The term is derived from the Roman law, and means (as a noun) a person holding the character of a trustee, or a character analogous to that of a trustee,in respect to the trust and confidence involved in it and the scrupulous good faith and candor which it requires. Thus, a person is a fiduciary who is invested with rights and powers to be exercised for the benefit of another person. Svanoe v. Jurgens, 144 111.507, 33 N. E. 955; Stoll v. King, 8 How. Prac. (N. Y.) 299.As an adjective it means of the nature of a trust; having the characteristics of a trust; analogous to a trust; relating to or founded upon a trust or confidence.



In the civil law this term corresponds nearly to our “cestuique trust.” It designates a person who has the real or beneficial interest in an estate or fund, the title or administration of which is temporarily confided to another. See Story,Eq. Jur.


A defense which insists that the plaintiff never had the right to institute the suit, or that, if he had, the original right is extinguished or determined.


The enjoyment which a man has of an estate in his own right and for his own benefit, and not as trustee for another. 11 H. L. Cas. 271.


The repudiation or renunciation of a right or claim vested in a person of which he had formerly alleged to be his. The refusal, waiver, or denial of an estate or right offered to a person. The disavowal, denial, or renunciation of an Interest, right, or property imputed to a person or alleged to be his. Also the declaration, or the instrument, by which such disclaimer is published. Moores v. Clackamas County, 40 Or.536, 67 Pac. 662.Of estates. The act by which a party refuses to accept an estate which has been conveyed to him. Thus, a trustee is said to disclaim who releases to his fellow-trustees his estate, and relieves himself of the trust. Watson v. Watson, 13 Conn. 85; KentuckyUnion Co. v. Cornett, 112 Ky. 677, 66 S. W. 728.


A party, plaintiff or defendant, who sues out a writ or other process, or appears to conduct his case in court himself, instead of through a solicitor or counsel, is said to act and appear in person.


the nature or partaking of the qualities of human beings, or of movable property. As to personal “Action,” “Assets,” “Chattels,” “Contract,” “Covenant,” “Credit,” “De- mand,” “Disability,” “Franchise,” “Injury,” “Judgment,” “Knowledge,” “Law,” “Liability.” “Liberty.” “Notice,” “Property.” “Replevin,” “Representatives.” “Rights,” “Security,” “Service,” “Servitude,” “Statute,” “Tax,” “Tithes,” “Tort,” and “Warranty,” see those titles. Personal things cannot be done by another. Finch, Law, b. 1, c. 3, n. 14. Personal things cannot be granted over. Finch, Law, b. 1, c. 3, n. 15. Personal things die with the person. Finch, Law, b. 1, c. 3, n. 16. Personalia personam seqnnntnr. Personal things follow the person. Flanders v. Cross, 10 Cush. (Mass.) 516.




Incapable of being aliened, that is, sold and transferred


This word has had various meanings at different stages of history. In the Roman law, it denoted one who was either born free or emancipated, and was the OPPOSITE OF “SLAVE.” In feudal law, it designated an allodial proprietor, as distinguished from a vassal or feudal tenant. (And so in Pennsylvania colonial law. Fry’s Election Case,71 Pa. 308, 10 Am. Rep. 098.) In old English law, the word described a freeholder or tenant by free services; one who was not a villain. In modern legal phraseology, it is the appellation of a member of a city or borough having the right of suffrage, or a member of any municipal corporation invested with full civic rights. A person in the possession and enjoyment of all the civil and political rights accorded to the people under a free government.

10) FREE

Unconstrained; having power to follow the dictates of his own will. Not subject to the dominion of another. Not compelled to involuntary servitude. Used in this sense as opposed to “slave.”2. Not bound to service for a fixed term of years; in distinction to being bound as an apprentice.3. Enjoying full civic rights.4. Available to all citizens alike without charge; as a free school.5. Available for public use without charge or toll; as a free bridge.6. Not despotic; assuring liberty; defending individual rights against encroachment by any person or class; instituted by a free people; said of governments, institutions, etc.


The state of being free; liberty; self-determination; absence of restraint;the opposite of slavery.The power of acting, in the character of a moral personality, according to thedictates of the will, without other check, hindrance, or prohibition than such as may beimposed by just and necessary laws and the duties of social life.The prevalence, in the government and constitution of a country, of such a systemof laws and institutions as secure civil liberty to the individual citizen.


In Roman law, the right of rescission or revocation of an executory contract 011 failure of the other party to fulfill his part of the agreement. See Mackeld. Rom. Law,


The possession of sovereign power; supreme political authority; paramount control of the constitution and frame of government and Its administration ; the self-sufficient source of political power, from which all specific political powers are derived; the international independence of a state, combined with the right and power of regulating its internal affairs without foreign dictation; also a political society, or state, which is sovereign and independent. See Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall. 455, 1 L. Ed. 440: Union Bank v. Hill, 3 Cold. (Tenn.) 325; Moore v. Shaw, 17 Cal. 218, 79 Am. Dec. 123. “The freedom of the nation has its correlate in the sovereignty of the nation. Political sovereignty is the assertion of the self-determinate will of the organic people, and in this there is the manifestation of its freedom. It is in and through the determination of its sovereignty that the order of the nation is constituted and maintained.” Mulford, Nation, p. 129.


As used in coustitutioual law, this right includes personal freedom, freedom of contract, exemption from oppression or invidious discrimination, the right to follow one’s individual preference in the choice of an occupation and the application of his energies, liberty of conscience, and the right to enjoy the domestic relations and the privileges of the family and the home. Black, Const. Law (3d Ed.) p. 544. See Ruhstrat v. People, 185 111. 133, 57 N. E. 41, 49 L R. A. 181, 76 Am. St. Rep. 30; Hooper v. California, 105 U. S. 648, 15 S. Ct. 207, 39 L. Ed. 297; Butchers’ Union, etc., Co. v. Crescent City Live Stock, etc., Co., Ill U. S. 740, 4 Sup. Ct. 652, 28 L. Ed. 585.


created by law and depend upon civilized society; or they are those which are plainly assured by natural law (Borden v. State, 11 Ark. 519, 44 Am. Dec. 217); or those which, by fair deduction from the present physical, moral, social, and religious characteristics of man, he must be invested with, and which he ought to have realized for him in a jural society, in order to fulfill the ends to which his nature calls him. 1 Woolsey, Polit. Science, p. 20. Such are the rights of life, liberty, privacy, and good reputation. See Black, Const. Law (3d Ed.) 523. Civil rights are such as belong to every citizen of the state or country, or, in a wider seuse, to all its inhabitants, and are not connected with the organization or administration of government. They include the rights of property, marriage, protection by the laws, freedom of contract, trial by jury, etc. See Winnett v. Adams, 71 Neb. 817, 99 N. W. 081. Or, as otherwise defined, civil rights are rights appertaining to a person by virtue of his citizenship in a state or community. Bights capable of being enforced or redressed in a civil action. Also a term applied to certain rights secured to citizens of the United States by the thirteenth and fourteenth amendments to the constitution, and by various acts of congress made in pursuance thereof. Iowa v. Railroad Co. (C. C.) 37 Fed. 498, 3 L. R. A. 554; State v. Powers, 51 N. J. Law, 432, 17 Atl. 909; Bowles v. Ilabermann, 95 N. Y. 247; People v. Washington, 30 Cal. 05S; Fletcher v. Tuttle, 151 111. 41, 37 N. E. 083, 25 L. R. A. 143, 42 Am. St. Rep. 220; llronek v. People, 134 111. 139, 24 N. E. 801, 8 L. R. A. 837, 23 Am. St Rep. 052. Political rights consist in the power to participate, directly or indirectly, in the establishment or administration of government, such as the right of citizenship, that of suffrage, the right to hold public office, and the right of petition. See Black Const. Law (3d Ed.) 524; Winnett v. Adams, 71 Neb. 817, 99 N. W. 081. Personal rights is a term of rather vague import, but generally it may be said to mean the right of personal security, comprising those of life, limb, body, health, reputation, and the right of personal liberty. Ai an adjective, the term “right” means just, morally correct, consonant with ethical principles or rules of positive law. It is the opposite of wrong, unjust illegal. “Right” is used in law, as well as in ethics, as opposed to “wrong.” Thus, a person may acquire a title by wrong. In old English law. The term denoted an accusation or charge of crime. Fitzh. Nat Brev. 66 F. See, also, DROIT; JUS; RECHT. Other compound and descriptive terms. Base right. In Scotch law, a subordinate right; the right of a subvassal in the lands held by him. Bell.


Freedom; exemption from extraneous control. The power of the will, in its moral freedom, to follow the dictates of its unrestricted choice, and to direct the external acts of the individual without restraint, coercion, or control from other persons. See Booth v. Illinois, 1S4 U. S. 425, 22 Sup. Ct. 425, 46 L. Ed. 623 ; Munn v. Illinois, 94 U. S. 142. 24 L. Ed. 77; People v. Warden of City Prison. 157 N. Y. 116, 51 N. E. 1006. 43 L. R. A. 264, 68 Am. St. Rep. 7i

The defaulting and dishonoring party will be foreclosed on by latches and estopped from maintaining or enforcing the original offer in any court or administrative unit and you agree that the Undersigned may exercise her exclusive remedy as to the stipulated and agreed upon misapplication of the statue, unlawful search and seizure, malicious prosecution. THE DEFAULTING OR DISHONORING PARTY


I attest to the fact that I am the Executor, Dual Administrator, and Beneficiary of the Estate of BRANDIA TAAMU and was and always have been before the matter before the courts today. As the Executor of the Estate state on my own unlimited liability, say that I have read the above affidavit, and do know the contents to be true, correct, complete and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth in accordance with God and Man’s Law.


To know the laws is not to observe their mere words, but their force and power; I that is, the essential meaning in which their efficacy resides.] Dig. 1, 3, 17; 1 Kent Comm. 402. Scire propria est rem ratione et per causam cognoscere. To know properly is to know a thing in its reason, and by its cause. We are truly said to know anything, where we know the true cause thereof. Co. Litt 1836.

Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, which sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, Sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exist and acts.” Supreme Court Decision, Woo Lee vs. Hopkins 118 U.S. 356

Brandia Taamu (Electronic Signature)

Executor for the Estate of BRANDIA TAAMU


wordpress visitor

Judge Mitchell’s Oath of Office (and other useless bonds)

So… Now that I know my rights, I know what is really going  on.

In one week will be ONE YEAR since I have seen my animals. One year may not seem like a long time in the scheme of things but one year goes by day by day, hour by hour, minute by minute, birthdays, & holidays pass, the nights seem longer then they’ve ever been, the days just blend into the misery.

Of course the City hasn’t met my demands nor their obligations, I didn’t expect them to. We all know by law that they think they are accountable to NO ONE, they don’t follow, the law, the Constitution, or any form of ethics presribed by either, it seems their “Moral Compass” is deviant as well.

These bonds are connected to a Suriety, that is what I have to go after since Judge Mitchell doesn’t want to comply with Justice, Truth, Laws, or the Constitution.

These are the documents that he bases his office on, that he bases his authority on, but why would anyone, or how could anyone respect a man who can’t, keep his oath? It is said a man’s word is his bond. this applies to men of integrity… The other one’s have to sign an Oath & get bonded to make them keep it.

Now as I told everyone Judge Mitchell & I share a Grandmother, that was incorrect, we share a Grandfather ( I have our family tree listed on my webpage). My greats Grandmother was Mary Anne Mitchell, he knows who his was…

The problem lies in the fact that the ONE person who could’ve & should’ve taken ONE look at this case & dropped it more than 8 months ago: Didn’t. Plain & simple, he CHOSE to disregard the very oath that he took, he refused to restore my unalienable rights, he chose to ignore the very instrument that gave him the power he holds. He chose to disregard the law, he chose to keep his standing in the Good Old boy Club, then he makes statements that show his true feelings, his feelings of “Superiority” when he has none.

“Oath of Office” a short simple statement, an instrument  intended to uphold truth & justice. How sad & pathetic? Oh well if you’re in the mood for a good laugh click on the link below & laugh away…



wordpress visitor

What is it that I DO advocate? (Part 6)

I have been on a quest for justice, I can’t get it from the person who took an Oath to Administer it. So traditional law is not working for me in this POS city.

My case is VERY UNUSUAL, most prosecutors & judges don’t disregard the law, & violate just about every civil right a human being has so I have had to explore alternative methods of defense.

I have been learning Bar Law, Civil Law, Admiralty Law, even Canon Law, I have explored the Patriot Community, the Sovereigns, even the Freeman. I’ve even dropped right smack into the middle of the damn Aryan Nation… UNCOMFORTABLE! (((ACK!!!))) They were actually quite nice to me, & taught me quite a bit but once we got into the munitions part I gracefully bowed out. I have subscribed to a few channels that sounded good at first until they started talking about Alien anal probes (YIKES!!!) The bottom line is I have been learning.

I have figured out some things about what I stand for, I am not very keen on the alternative laws, as some advocate violence, or total treason. I honestly believe our laws are good, but only when they are being enforced, only when they are administered with justice. Only when the people who are supposed to obey them, do. I am on the receiving end of the bad kind.

Some of the groups advocate not having a license or a license plate. HUH? How are we going to keep drunk or aggressive drivers in check, the fees associated with licenses go to fix the roads we drive on. Some advocate total treason, I believe in order, I advocate being good citizens, but only to a Government that KNOWS IT’S PLACE, that understands that they are beholden to us, NOT US TO THEM.

I also believe we are to blame, for corruption, for Wall Street, for the injustices in this country, it is our fault for becoming lazy & not being involved in the process, we would rather sit on Facebook for 4 hours playing Farmville then to learn how & why our Government is run, or to become involved, but we sure do whine when things go wrong, yet is is us who elected these ingrates, whether by vote or lack of a vote. We handed over our power with the “un-Patriot Act”, we let corruption run rampant & all we do is whine on Twitter about how bad it is. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THE CORRUPT GOVERNMENT WANTS YOU TO DO: BE LAZY – BE UNEDUCATED – BE AFRAID – BE UNINVOLVED. Just go to work & make them their tax money & shut the frick up.

Our Government has become like an out of control teenager, we didn’t set any limits for them, & now we have the nerve to be surprised when they run amuk??? Because… YES: We gave “Birth” to these idiots, we let them do whatever they want & now are reaping the ramifications of LETTING them run out of control with no discipline!


Anyone can run for office, seriously. As sick of the bull as the American people are right now they’d probably vote for anyone. I wouldn’t suggest you run for Mayor if you can’t balance your own checkbook or have no management experience, but for Heaven’s sake would it kill you to go to a City or County Council meeting & ask some questions, or make some demands? Seriously, YOU hired these people, you are the boss of them, control your “Public Employees & Public Servants” already!

Our situation has become critical, almost like a Domestic Violence relationship, we just keep letting them kick our ass, we keep taking it & coming back for more, & we have the NERVE to look down on people in communist countries, at least they know they got their butt’s handed to them, they choose to live like that, we are living like that but pretending we’re not. UMMM… Quit drinking the Kool-Aid folks!

wordpress visitor