Rescue is the place to be if you want to see crazy in a can… Zoo wars (Top Cats Roar)

My friend writes a blog, she makes me look calm & reserved when she gets on a roll. On the other hand when she does appear to be calm about something, I get very worried. She has been doing a series I have followed here this month about Big Cats Rescue, HSUS, & a couple other agencies on my radar.

1) Zoo Wars I -Is it stalking…or is it STALKING?!?

GW Exotic Animal Park

Big Cats Rescue

Hopefully you can see the stark differences between the two parks, BCR has no roofs or covers over any of the enclosures, & it appears their gardener either ran away or was eaten… That would almost be funny if her first husband did not mysteriously disappear, but that is okay, she moved on & got another husband… a rich lawyer far as I know. So she is now attacking GW with…. Donated money? Meant to care for the animals? So why does she hate Joe & GW so badly? Well cause she is a “Sanctuary” – he is a “Roadside Zoo”

2) Zoo Wars -second edition BREAKING NEWS!!!

According to the Florida Wildlife Commission Big Cat Rescue is NOT a sanctuary!!! Opps…Yes, it’s true…Big Cat Rescue is nothing more than a ‘Roadside Zoo’…the very same type of place that Baskin complains so much about and attacked. The very same one she has spent 100’s of thousands of donated money to sue for “copy write infringement” ( How would she know if he did? How would she spell it if she could prove it?)

BCR 3 BCR CAGE 1 BCR cage 2

There is no comparison to GW Exotic Animal Park

Bottom line is that Big Cat Rescue is ADVERTISED as a sanctuary and FWC says it is NOT-This is purposely committing FRAUD on the public. They operate as any other business without so much as a dime paid in taxes on contributions with the contributions it receives being tax deductible because they have a 501(c)3 …Animals needing placement in Florida that need to go to a sanctuary should NOT be going to Big Cat Rescue. This explains why Baskin has to buy animals: A “Sanctuary” that has to BUY it’s animals? Curiouser & curiouser… HSUS brought her into his organization of sanctuaries (GFAS) and the state of Florida says she is NOT

Big Cat Rescue
Status: GFAS Accredited Sanctuary
www.BigCatRescue.org
Tampa, Florida USA

Big cat Rescue is listed on the Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries, it does NOT meet Florida criteria as a sanctuary. Are you confused yet? A sanctuary that is not a sanctuary is going after a roadside zoo, for copy write infringement… Are you with me so far?

One things for sure… You can’t count on the police to do anything about it

3) So who or what powers the GFAS? Zoo wars III

GFAS offers its sincere thanks to the following generous supporters, listed in alphabetical order. Thanks to their support, GFAS has been transformed from a ambitious vision into an effective reality, helping sanctuaries help animals!

US Fish & Wildlife Service/Ken Stansell
American Anti-Vivisection Society
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA)
Animal Assistace Foundation
Austin Cotton
Animal Welfare Institute

Brn Free Foundation
Born Free USA
Captive Wild Animal Protection Coalition
Elliot Dinnerstein Foundation
Farm Sanctuary
The Handsel Foundation
The Humane Society of the United States
International Fund for Animal Welfare
Pettus Crowe Foundation
Summerlee Foundation
World Society for the Protection of Animals

Okay so they have an impressive donor list themselves but any time HSUS, or ASPCA are involved, that worries me tremendously

4) Zoo Wars IV -Special Weekend Edition- Can you say AETA?!?

Now we have PETA, disgruntled ex-employees, taking pictures & the FBI getting involved & going through Joe’s computers in this freak show & in the mean time Ms BCR did win her lawsuit against a bankrupt man… Didn’t think that one through did she?

5) Zoo Wars V-People Magazine

So getting back to Carol Lewis Baskins previous husband….

Don Lewis’s body was never recovered nor was he ever found as ‘still alive’. Exactly WHEN and WHERE Don Lewis will turn up is unknown but there has been much speculation concerning this matter. From being put thru a grinder and then fed the cats to being buried under the septic tank (that is in the cougar enclosure) that WAS poured within days of his disappearance, to being alive and well in Costa Rica or some other place however, there is little doubt he would have left penniless or left anything to Baskin. Don Lewis pleaded with the sheriff’s office that he was in fear for his life (interesting claim coming from a husband). What I don’t understand, is that the judge would not grant this because ‘he continued to live with her’. How many times have we heard that the abused person, no matter man or woman, would continue to reside with their abuser?!? In this case, I doubt Don Lewis would pay to stay in a motel rather than stay in his own home.

http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20127008,00.html

For her part, Carole Lewis, who harbors suspicions of her own—among them the notion that Don may have staged his disappearance—finds the Sweeney Todd theory grimly humorous. “My tigers eat meat; they don’t eat people,” she says. “There would be bones and remains of my husband out there. I’m amazed that people would even think such a thing.”

Okay so now I am actually scared of this woman… Um… People ARE made out of meat! Is she trying to tell us that her sanctuary looks like a bone yard with bits & pieces of all the animals they eat just lying about? Yikes!

6) Zoo Wars VI- SANCTUARY OR SCAM-TUARY?!?-THE TRUTH

Uh oh… you know your famous when someone makes a video about you: Now people are starting to FINALLY ask questions. I still want to know how a sanctuary is called a sanctuary if they BUY their pets.

7) Zoo Wars VII -An inside look at Big Cat Rescue

I’m sure by now that everyone knows that is perfectly acceptable to have garbage, sewage & built up animal waste inside of flimsy pens in the middle of Hurricane Alley….

8.) Zoo Wars VIII Big Cat Rescue Goes after Tony the Tiger

ALDF & Baskin are now trying to get Tony the Tiger (the truck stop tiger in La.) He is a senior cat who is a roadside attraction for many folks in the Louisiana Parish area

So you have to ask yourself: What is tofu & salad eating attorney doing down in the bayou? You also have to wonder “what reputable sanctuary” they believe they have the God given power to come in & take this animal to.

La appeal court: Truck stop tiger permit invalid

A permit to keep a tiger named Tony at a truck stop outside Baton Rouge was invalid because the truck stop’s owner wasn’t the animal’s legal owner, the state 1st Circuit Court of Appeal ruled Thursday. The three-judge panel upheld most of a district court ruling in the case involving the 12-year-old Bengal-Siberian tiger mix displayed as an attraction at Tiger Truck Stop in Grosse Tete, about 20 miles west of Baton Rouge. The panel, in its decision, also upheld an order barring the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries from granting a new permit to truck stop owner Michael Sandlin. “We’re thrilled,” said Matthew Liebman, attorney for the Animal Legal Defense Fund, of Cotati, Calif.

There is NO LIMIT on the crazy of these animal rights extremists. Mark my words they are coming to your state, they may already be there, waiting & watching. Talk about a pathetic existence.

I left out the last two articles but you can see it at Top Cats Roar & I am going break off on my own a little bit here. I found many many articles showing, absolutely proving she is nothing more then a breeder turned scam artist turned Animal Rights Activist who is talking about destroying her animals now that “she has seen the light”

Important Facts You Should Know About Big Cat Rescue of Tampa Florida

Her “sanctuary”, which is still by definition a zoo, is the largest accredited big cat facility. The facility possesses an incredibly rare white serval whose origins are also being questioned, as well as sand cats that were ‘surplus from a breeding program’. While no longer does she breed, buy, or sell animals, her original plans seem to be moving as strongly as ever but under a new guise.

It seems to be uncommon for Big Cat Rescue to praise rescues that are similar to theirs, but they sure have made a lot of noise in insisting that they, and not any other facility, should be the caretakers of Tony the tiger who currently and controversially resides at a truck stop… even going as far as to have an available space for Tony for years, despite their claim that they must turn away many animals annually.

Carole Baskin now states that her ultimate goal is to close down her rescue, and completely phase out big cats (and most likely other exotics that will be up to her determination) in captivity because these animals cannot live a respectful existence in such a setting… and then Big Cat Rescue’s videos pan to their collection of animals…living a respectful existence in captivity.

One has to wonder if this article she wrote was in fact subconsciously directed at herself…

“Who are Exotic Pet Owners”.

“What is almost universally shared by those who keep wild animals as pets, or props and even most of those who operate private zoos and sanctuaries is that they are uneducated, poor, unattractive, hot tempered, attention seekers. Marked differences in the genders are that men are usually slovenly, womanizing, have a criminal history or leanings, and are dependant on drugs or alcohol to manage their depression. Whereas women are most often blonde, fat, have low self esteem, are childless or estranged from their families, and prone to rages of jealousy.”

Carole Baskin

This webiste has pages & pages of articles about her abuse & fraud.

Who is Big Cat Rescue

NOTHING in rescue ever makes sense, the people involved for the most part seemed to have escaped insane asylums WITHOUT their medication. Ego’s rule, humaniac’s are everywhere, save the lion, the elephant & the tiger while celebrating over the dead body of a cow or a pig or a chicken, & hey: If you can’t find out anything bad or damaging on “The Competition” MAKE IT UP! I swear with God as my witness the more I read & learn the crazier I get, because 1st you have to read it, then you have to wrap your head around it, then you actually have to figure it out after you have gotten it all straightened out IF YOU CAN…. I’ll be in the corner banging my head against a wall.

wordpress visitor

Are animal laws political? Yes & no…

Don’t you hate it when I answer that way?

I don’t think Animal Laws are intended to be political at all. I believe that they are being created with good intentions. I also believe they need to go further than they do, but in the right direction. We are at a crossroads where we have to figure out how to truly protect animals & preserve people’s constitutional rights.

I believe that animal laws are used & abused in a political arena, a good deal of animal cruelty cases that make the news are almost always politically motivated.

By now most people realize that agencies like HSUS grandstand on these big cases to garner donations & that they don’t help hardly any animals: they are legislators, pure & simple. They lie & say they have animals they don’t, they take all the donations meant for the victims people see on the TV commercials or in the news & run off when the cameras leave, & when they are forced to take animals they dump them at the nearest high kill shelter & run to the bank to count their money.

We now know that the ASPCA is riding the bread & butter train of the term “Hoarder” & that they actually only run one shelter (that I know of)

The scariest agency I have seen is the American Humane Association, they are trying to garner the market on child & animal abuse, not surprisingly a spin off from none other than HSUS.

Let us not forget PETA, now these are some scary people who don’t want you to wear fur, but when they “rescue dogs” they murder them all! They & HSUS want to abolish any kind of pet ownership at all.

I am not even sure how to explain Humane Watch, they are part of the watchdog group Center for Consumer Freedom… So they go around & bash HSUS & beg for donations to help them fight them but as of yet I have not seen any fight, just sensationalized stories with bizzare headlines. I also find it amusing they capitalize on the fact that HSUS doesn’t donate any of it’s money to actually help the animals they pimp out on their TV ads but neither do they.

Best Friends is another terrifying agency that even I can’t understand & now they have control of some of the L.A shelters. I have read a lot of different things about them but it is all so confusing & sordid that I can’t follow it.

Here is where the politics come in:

Everyone has an agenda. The animal rights groups seem to have some type of mental deficiency from lack of animal proteins.

Personally I don’t care to eat meat, but if someone gets in the way of my eggs they are going to be a hurting unit, we have a farmer who raises his own chickens who are not only free range but they are indoor outdoor chickens. He literally has put linoleum in every room in his house so they go from the house to the yard to the coop or the barn, they all have names & if they die they are all given a proper burial & if you have never seen a chicken graveyard it is quite a sight to behold.

If I do have an occasion to eat meat we have another farmer who knocks the animals out before hand so that they won’t feel any pain & they don’t release the fear hormones & trust me there is a big huge large difference in taste. He is also a Native so he blesses the animal to thank it for giving it’s life to sustain others.

I am allergic to milk but can still eat other dairy products & we have a farmer for that too! Unfortunately he brought in a new bull who managed to knock up every single cow he had so we have to wait for the nursing calves & I have a wicked craving for some cottage cheese right now…

Anyway, these organizations have their ulterior motives & they know how to pull at people’s heartstrings, they have turned it into an art form. They create this legislation knowing full well that they are violating people’s Constitutional rights, but they convince people that it is for the greater good, just like they did with the “Un-Patriot Act” . Most people truly want to help & protect animals & a lot are even willing to give up certain personal rights to make sure that it happens. Once they guage how people react to that law they push it just a little further, & if that doesn’t get challenged they go for the gusto.

Then you mix in these corrupt agencies & give them the know-how on how to use those laws against people to further their own agenda & you have a recipe for Constitutional catastrophe. You can watch it work & you can watch it backfire in any state in this union.

The sad part is the agencies & people who really are out to help animals get lost in the crossfire.

I think most of you know I hate the Everett Animal shelter with all of my being, the agents, the manager, the people involved who allow this to continue, the Everett Animal Foundation that gets donations to help animals but won’t give up any money to help animals… Allowing the slaughter of 82 cats in one day. It is a PRIME example of how not to act, & what not to do.

There are however agencies who are in there fighting the good fight, within the parameters of the law & making a difference in the lives of animals & people. I have worked with these people & seen the good they do.

I am a card carrying member of the Federation of Animal Care & Control Agencies, a member of the National District Attorneys Association, a member of the Animal Law Coalition, & a huge fan of the Stockman’s Coalition, & Pet Defense I am actually involved in about 20 other agencies as well.

I am more than  interested in any & all animal legislation there is. If you think you have been targeted unfairly or for political reasons please contact me, tell me your story. I will do my best to help you, but if you can’t back up what you say with documents then I can not post it here… Freedom of speech is one thing, slander is quite another.

Even agencies I do negative stories about have a right to tell their side of the story, & explain their position, because if I am wrong or interpreting something wrong then it needs to be shown so that in the long run animals aren’t hurt or suffer for it. For me that is ALL it is about, the animals, their safety & well being, people have thumbs they can defend themselves, animals have no one to speak for them or act for them but us.

(***Note to readers, this is in response to a very log search term, but it is much easier to email me at finallyhomerescue@yahoo.com & just tell me your story, I am a fair person but I need to always make sure I keep integrity in what I write to protect myself & the truth)

wordpress visitor

Ginger’s Pet Rescue… What is the truth?

I get lots of story ideas from my “search terms” I even have people who communicate with me in a roundabout way with the search terms. Soooo I get a search term “Ginger Luke animal cruelty conviction Montana, starving neglect” Huh?

Well I knew that they were starving their animals at the Wild Eyes animal “refuge” or rather I had heard the rumor, but until now really had no evidence.

Agriculture Decisions – Vol. 65 July to December, 2006

Volume 65 USDA.Gov

LUECK, HANS JAKOB ………………………… 1229

LUKE, GINGER GAIL …………………………. 1229

One USDA Decision (please note Ginger’s name on the top of the page)

Another USDA Decision (Please note Ginger’s name again)

911-AnimalAbuse.com There are a couple stories here about the whole situation.

I have been getting a lot of complaints from breeders who are getting irritated with Ms Luke’s persistence at buying their animals to sell at her rescue events, a few ex-volunteers saying she is pocketing the money from sales & not reporting it, & lots of complaints from various shelters in California saying that she orders dogs on credit & has never paid for them. She has been buying from breeders for years though

Selah Couple Apply for Kennel Permit

Then there is the question of the massive amounts of property she owns, & is buying up all the time. I looked up the business info from the Rickshaw & there is no way she is making enough money from there to be buying all of these properties. This woman & Rose Adams were responsible for the heartache I am going through now, she is also responsible for most of the crap I have had to put up with since 2006

Here is what this website has to say about Ginger’s Rescue…

(The blue links takes you to the websites I got the stories or documents from)

Gingers Pet Rescue, Wild Eyes Animal Adventures
Employer Identification Number (EIN)    830347515
Name of Organization    Gingers Pet Rescue
Secondary Name    Wild Eyes Animal Adventures
In Care of Name    Hans-Jakob Lueck
Address    1138 N 166th St, Seattle, WA 98133-5406
Subsection    Charitable Organization
Ruling Date    09/2004
Deductibility    Contributions are deductible
Foundation    Organization which receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or the general public
Organization    Corporation
Exempt Organization Status    Unconditional Exemption
Tax Period    12/2009
Assets    $1 to $9,999
Income    $100,000 to $499,999
Filing Requirement    990 (all other) or 990EZ return
Asset Amount    $8,321
Amount of Income    $307,386
Form 990 Revenue Amount    $307,386
National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities (NTEE)    Animal-Related: Zoo, Zoological Society

So what is Wild Eyes? Well I found this story from 2004  which tells a very strange twisted tale…

Popular animal park here faces federal charges for buying critters

Posted: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:00 am
By RICHARD HANNERS
Hungry Horse News

A 55-count indictment charging Kenneth and Nancy Kraft, of Racine, Minn., and seven others with violating the Endangered Species Act and the Lacey Act was announced in mid-August by the U.S. Attorney’s office in Minneapolis.

Included in the indictment were owners of two menageries in Montana—Wild Eyes-owner Hans Jacob Lueck, 50, of Shoreline, Wash., and Troy Allen Hyde, owner of Animals of Montana, Inc., in Bozeman.

Lueck was charged with four counts relating to both of the federal wildlife protection acts.

Paul Bernstein, Lueck’s attorney in Seattle, said Lueck planned to plead not guilty by telephone at an arraignment in St. Paul, Minn., on Sept. 14.

According to the indictment, in March 2000, Lueck paid $10,000 for a white tiger and $2,500 for a grizzly bear cub. In June 2002, he allegedly purchased a spotted leopard cub, a tiger cub, a raccoon and a wolf pup for an unknown amount of money in excess of $300.

Furthermore, the indictment claims, Lueck and Wild Eyes did not have U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service-issued captive-bred wildlife registrations or any other permit for any of the protected species they possessed. Wild Eyes did, however, possess an exhibitor’s license issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture since November 1999.

Lueck, the Krafts, Hyde and the other five named defendants face a maximum of five years in prison and/or a $250,000 fine if convicted of conspiracy or the wildlife-related charges.

Lueck and his wife, Ginger, purchased the facility after a visit to the area in 1998. But two years ago, claiming they were being harassed by state wildlife officials in Montana, the Luecks began looking for a new home for their exotic animals in western Washington.

In the meantime, the Luecks are soliciting donations for their Wild Eyes Foundation, in Seattle, Wash. According to their Web site, the foundation plans to offer a sanctuary for exotic pets that have lost their owners; seminars on wildlife husbandry; participation in national and international captive breeding programs; veterinary and research programs; and education programs aimed at children

Well you all know me by now: After all of the grief torture & heartache this woman has caused my animals, my business & my life’s work I had to keep digging!

So I found this decision from the USDA at this link but this is from 2 years after the article (?) All I can gather is they were illegally transporting animals without a current license & they were endangered exotic animals. White Tigers, Baby Grizzlies, etc… but the thing in 2004 was for the same kinds of animals only they were lying & forging documents to receive & sell animals. In 2006 their license was totally revoked though. The abuse, starvation & neglect are a separate issue & I may have to go to Montana to get the charging papers & information.

So what does that mean for Ginger’s Rescue AKA Wild Eyes? Well in 2005 Jakob Lueck was arrested for starving those same animals & placed on house arrest & probation. But Ginger was charged as well. So a woman who starves animals, transports endangered animals illegally using fraudulent paperwork is standing in judgement of ME?

Seems that Ms Luke is a convicted Animal Abuser as well, right along with her husband! They were married when this was happening so what gives? You will notice that the Wild Eyes/Ginger’s Rescue are both under his name, which is why he was named & charged. This is good information for me since now I know what property to file a lien on, which names they may be using to obtain or quit claim those properties, & I can go after him as well since she was harassing me, slandering me, & libeling me via “Ginger’s Rescue”

Wild Eyes Animal owner jailed & fined

Jakob Lueck, 51, of Seattle …
Eventually, he hired someone to care for the animals, and he didn’t do a good job. Federal authorities arrested him, and Lueck will pay a fine of $10,000 and is on house arrest for six months until March 2006. He eventually brought some of his cats to the Rocky Mountain Wildlife center, where Craig agreed to take them in. “It broke my heart,” Lueck said. “But you have to be realistic.” Lueck wants to visit them in March, when his house arrest ends, and he realizes his mistake. “You have to realize that no matter how much I love them, am I the right person to be in charge of them?” Lueck said. “No. I didn’t realize that at the time. They looked a little skinny to me, I have to admit.” All of Lueck’s animals at the wildlife center, two bears, a mountain lion, a leopard and two tigers were malnourished, for instance.

I have a lot more research to do it seems… I am requesting the documents from the whole situation as to why they are only reporting that he was on house arrest, not about Ginger. I then realize something, I am looking for the WRONG name. Then I start  looking for Hans Jac(k)ob Lueck & then I find this:

Superior Court Case Summary Court: Snohomish Superior Case Number: 11-1-01364-7 HANS JACOB LUECK
06-20-2011 COSTS ASSESSED Costs Assessed 200.00
06-20-2011 INFORMATION  Information Albert, Janice Conroy     
06-20-2011 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION PROB CAUSE Affidavit/declaration Prob Cause 06/20/2011 OMNIBUS APPLICATION OF PROS ATTY Omnibus Application Of Pros Atty    
06-22-2011 CERTIFICATE Certificate Of Address Search     
06-29-2011 SUMMONS     Summons     
07-01-2011 NOT OF APPEAR AND REQ FOR DISCOVERY Steinborn, Jeffrey     
07-05-2011 INITIAL ARRAIGNMENTACTION Omnibus Hearing 07-28-2011 Judge Weiss
07-05-2011 ORDER OF RELEASE Order Of Release     
07-05-2011 ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE ACTION Stip Cont 10/22/2011 09-23-2011JT
07-28-2011 OMNIBUS HEARING JDG0023 Omnibus Hearing Judge Eric Z. Lucas     
07-28-2011 ORDER FOR HEARING Order For Hearing Plea 8/3/2011 @3pm C304
08-03-2011 MOTION HEARING ACTION 3.5 & 3.6 Hearing 10/14/2011RMACTION Arraign On Amended Information Judge Wilson
08-03-2011 AGREED TRIAL CONTINUANCE Agreed Trial Continuance 10/22/2011     
08-11-2011 NOTE FOR CALENDAR ACTION -trial Call Stip Cont 12/16/2011 10-21-2011JT
08-15-2011 SUMMONS     Summons     
08-22-2011 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE     Notice Of Appearance     
08-22-2011 DEMAND FOR ATD0002  Discovery & Jury Trial Arganian, David G.
09-23-2011 TRIAL CONTINUED: STIPULATED Trial Continued: Stipulated     
10-14-2011 CONTINUED: PLAINTIFF/PROS REQUESTED ACTION Continued: Plaintiff/pros Requested 3.5/3.6/aai Hrg  Judge Mckeeman
10-14-2011 MOTION HEARING ACTION  3.5 & 3.6 Hearing     
11-18-2011RM ACTION Arraign On Amended Information Judge Mckeen    
10-14-2011 AGREED TRIAL CONTINUANCE 12-16-2011JT
10-21-2011 TRIAL CONTINUED: STIPULATED         
11-18-2011 EVIDENTIARY HEARING JDG0016 Judge Kress    
11-18-2011 STIPULATION Stipulation To Admissibility Of Statements Of Dfdt      
12-16-2011 MOTION HEARING JDG0022 Motion Hearing Judge Downes     
12-16-2011 AGREED TRIAL CONTINUANCE  2/27/2012 @1pm C304 (monday)     
12-21-2011 NOTE FOR CALENDAR Note For Calendar 02-24-2012JT
01-05-2012 SUMMONS     Summons     
02-24-2012 MOTION HEARING  Motion Hearing Judge Downes     
02-24-2012 AGREED TRIAL CONTINUANCE  03-09-2012JT
03-09-2012 MOTION HEARING JDG0022  Judge Downes 03-16-2012JT
03-09-2012 Order Re-setting Hearing Dates Stipulation 3/15/2012 C304 @ 3pm     
03-15-2012 MOTION HEARING     Motion Hearing Court Accepts Stipulation For Bench Trial On Agreed Documentary Evidence Judge Fair     
03-15-2012 AGREED TRIAL CONTINUANCE  1pm Dept 12 Judge Fair 03-07-2013JC
03-16-2012 TRIAL CONTINUED: STIPULATED

So it seems like I will be making yet another trip down to the Snohomish County Courts to go find out what this is all about.

Then I start wondering… What is “Ginger’s” real name? Turns out it is Georgina Gail Luke

But I digress: I was looking up Snohomish County records & look what I found! PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THESE ARE LAND TRANSACTIONS ONLY FROM SNOHOMISH COUNTY The King County Site is closed until Monday morning,

Criteria: Grantor or Grantee Begins with LUECK HANS

9806160311 06/16/1998 QUIT CLAIM DEED LUKE GINGER G  LUECK HANS J & GINGER G LOT 9 EVERGREEN W/F TRACTS BROWN’S ADD A/P 38180000090007 Perm 

9806160312 06/16/1998 DEED OF TRUST LUECK HANS J & GINGER G (+) WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK  LOT 9 EVERGREEN W/F TRACTS BROWN’S ADD A/P 38180000090007 Perm 

200005080578 05/08/2000 DEEDS( EXCEPT QCDS) LUECK HANS J & GINGER G  LODWIG HOMES INC LOT P/13-15 EDMONDS HI-WAY TRS 43450000130209 Perm 

200101040427 01/04/2001 DEED OF TRUST LUECK HANS J & GINGER G  EQUITY ONE INC  LOT 9 EVERGREEN W/F TRS BROWN’S ADD A/P 00381800000900 Perm 

200103050739 03/05/2001 DEEDS (EXCEPT QCDS) LUECK HANS J & GINGER G KUNDUKLIJA SULEJMAN & HASIBA LOT P/5 BLK 5 ALDERWOOD MANOR 6 003731005005003 Perm 

200104100255 04/10/2001 RECONVEYANCE WASHINGTON RECONVEYANCE CO (+) LUECK HANS J & GINGER G (+) Perm 

200109040096 09/04/2001 DEEDS (EXCEPT QCDS) LUECK HANS J & GINGER G (+) DUMITRU SORIN & DRAGOMIRELA LOT 11 HEINZ PARK 00468800001100 Perm 

200109240186 09/24/2001 RECONVEYANCE WASHINGTON RECONVEYANCE CO (+) LUECK HANS J & GINGER G (+) Perm 

200707130379 07/13/2007 QUIT CLAIM DEED LUECK HANS JAKOB LUKE GEORGINA GAIL 00562300002502 Perm 

200804080096 04/08/2008 RECONVEYANCE CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY (+) LUECK HANS JAKOB (+) Perm 

200804250078 04/25/2008 RECONVEYANCE CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY (+) LUECK HANS JAKOB (+) Perm 

200806160723 06/16/2008 DEED OF TRUST LUECK HANS JAKOB (+) PACIFIC ONE MORTGAGE INC (+) LOT 9 EVERGREEN W/F TRS BROWN’S ADD A/P 00381800000900 Perm 

200806160724 06/16/2008 ASSIGNMENT OF DEED OF TRUST LUECK HANS JAKOB (+) CLAUSEN MARK A (+) Perm 

201004160394 04/16/2010 DEED OF TRUST LUECK HANS JAKOB (+) C C N J REAL INVESTMENTS L L C (+) LOT 9 EVERGREEN W/F TRS BROWN’S ADD A/P 00381800000900 Perm 

201011220054 11/22/2010 RECONVEYANCE SOUND LEGAL CENTER P L L C (+) LUECK HANS JAKOB (+) Perm 

199906110708 06/11/1999 DEED OF TRUST LUECK HANS-JACKOB ETUX (+) WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK (+) LOT P/13-15 EDMONDS HI WAY TRACTS 43450000130209 Perm 

9312174012 12/17/1993 MARRIAGE APPLICATION LUECK HANS-JAKOB LUKE GEORGINA GAIL Perm

9401104023 01/10/1994 MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE LUECK HANS-JAKOB LUKE GEORGINA GAIL Perm

9702060305 02/06/1997 DEED OF TRUST LUECK HANS-JAKOB & GINGER G (+) WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK (+) LT9 ASSESSORS PLAT EVERGREEN W/F TRS BROWN’S ADD Perm

9702060310 02/06/1997 DEED OF TRUST LUECK HANS-JAKOB & GINGER G (+) WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK (+) LT11 HEINZ PARK Perm

9702060311 02/06/1997 DEED OF TRUST LUECK HANS-JAKOB & GINGER G (+) WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK (+) P/LT5 BK5 A M 6 Perm

199906110707 06/11/1999 DEEDS (EXCEPT QCDS) THORNING THOMAS E & ELIZABETH P (+) LUECK HANS-JAKOB & GINGER G LOT P/13-15 EDMONDS HI WAY TRACTS 43450000130209 Perm 

199906110708 06/11/1999 DEED OF TRUST LUECK HANS-JAKOB & GINGER G (+) WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK (+) LOT P/13-15 EDMONDS HI WAY TRACTS 43450000130209 Perm 

9810120250 10/12/1998 RECONVEYANCE REGIONAL TRUSTEE SERV CORP (+) LUECK HANS J (+) Perm 

200005015005 05/01/2000 SHORT PLAT MAP LUECK HANS J (+) PUBLIC SEC 36 TWNSHP 27 RNG 03 NW NE Perm 

200005090446 05/09/2000 POWER OF ATTORNEY LUECK HANS J LUKE GINGER LOT P/13-15 EDMONDS HI WAY TRS 43450000130209 Perm

200103050738 03/05/2001 POWER OF ATTORNEY LUECK HANS J LUKE GINGER G LOT P/5 BLK 5 ALDERWOOD MANOR 6 003731005005003 Perm

200302250605 02/25/2003 RECONVEYANCE RELEASE SYSTEMS INC (+) LUECK HANS J (+) Perm 

200708025061 08/02/2007 EXCISE AFFIDAVIT LUECK HANS J LUKE GEORGINA G 308187 Perm
201004190164 04/19/2010 RECONVEYANCE SULLIVAN REBECCA LUECK HANS J Perm 

9702060305 02/06/1997 DEED OF TRUST LUECK HANS J & GINGER G WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK LT9 ASSESSORS PLAT EVERGREEN W/F TRS BROWN’S ADD Perm

9702060310 02/06/1997 DEED OF TRUST LUECK HANS J & GINGER G WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK LT11 HEINZ PARK Perm

9702060311 02/06/1997 DEED OF TRUST LUECK HANS J & GINGER G WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK P/LT5 BK5 A M 6 Perm

Criteria: Grantor or Grantee Begins with LUKE GEORGINA

200803065114 03/06/2008 EXCISE AFFIDAVIT LUKE GEORGINA LUKE TERRANCE J (+) 216896 Perm
200803065114 03/06/2008 EXCISE AFFIDAVIT LUKE GEORGINA (+) LUKE GEORGINA 216896 Perm
200708025060 08/02/2007 EXCISE AFFIDAVIT BALFOUR BRIAN K LUKE GEORGINA G (+) 308186 Perm
200708025061 08/02/2007 EXCISE AFFIDAVIT LUECK HANS J LUKE GEORGINA G 308187 Perm
200802280030 02/28/2008 QUIT CLAIM DEED LUKE GEORGINA G LUKE GEORGINA G (+) 00562300002502 Perm
200802280030 02/28/2008 QUIT CLAIM DEED LUKE GEORGINA G (+) LUKE GEORGINA G 00562300002502 Perm
9312174012 12/17/1993 MARRIAGE APPLICATION LUECK HANS-JAKOB LUKE GEORGINA GAIL Perm

9401104023 01/10/1994 MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE LUECK HANS-JAKOB LUKE GEORGINA GAIL Perm

200707130378 07/13/2007 DEEDS(EXCEPT QCDS) BALFOUR BRIAN K LUKE GEORGINA GAIL (+) 00562300002502 Perm
200707130379 07/13/2007 QUIT CLAIM DEED LUECK HANS JAKOB LUKE GEORGINA GAIL 00562300002502 Perm 

200707130380 07/13/2007 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GEORGINA GAIL PLAZA HOME MORTGAGE (+) 00562300002502 Perm
200804020217 04/02/2008 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GEORGINA GAIL (+) COUNTRYWIDE (+) LOT 25 RUCKER’S MILL 2 00562300002502 Perm
200804151100 04/15/2008 RECONVEYANCE RECON-TRUST COMPANY LUKE GEORGINA GAIL (+) Perm 

Criteria: Grantor or Grantee Begins with LUKE GINGER

200005090446 05/09/2000 POWER OF ATTORNEY LUECK HANS J LUKE GINGER LOT P/13-15 EDMONDS HI WAY TRS 43450000130209 Perm

200804020217 04/02/2008 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER (+) COUNTRYWIDE (+) LOT 25 RUCKER’S MILL 2 00562300002502 Perm
201004190164 04/19/2010 RECONVEYANCE SULLIVAN REBECCA (+) LUKE GINGER (+) Perm
8912190007 12/19/1989 DEEDS(EXCEPT QCDS) SNIDER JAMES W & ROXANNE I LUKE GINGER G LT11 HEINZ PARK Perm

8912190008 12/19/1989 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G FIREMAN’S FUND MORTGAGE CORP (+) LT11 HEINZ PARK Perm

9104190390 04/19/1991 DEEDS(EXCEPT QCDS) COLLINS HALDANE L & KIM M LUKE GINGER G LT5 BK5 A M 6 Perm

9104190391 04/19/1991 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G UNITED SAVINGS & LOAN BANK (+) LT5 BK5 A M 6 Perm

9208130652 08/13/1992 DEEDS(EXCEPT QCDS) SWANSON RAYMOND C LUKE GINGER G (+) LT9 A/P EVERGREEN W/F TRS BROWN’S ADD Perm

9208130653 08/13/1992 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G COMMUNITY WEST MORTGAGE INC (+) LT9 A/P EVERGREEN W/F TRS BROWN’S ADD Perm

9209230624 09/23/1992 ASSIGNMENT OF DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G (+) NORWEST MORTGAGE INC Perm

9307190369 07/19/1993 ASSIGNMENT LUKE GINGER G (+) BARCLAYS AMERICAN MTG CORP Perm

9310180585 10/18/1993 ASSIGNMENT LUKE GINGER G (+) BARCLAYS AMERICAN MTG CORP Perm

9311010411 11/01/1993 ASSIGNMENT LUKE GINGER G (+) NORWEST MORTGAGE INC Perm

9608060208 08/06/1996 ASSIGNMENT LUKE GINGER G (+) NORWEST MORTGAGE INC Perm

9703180360 03/18/1997 RECONVEYANCE GEORGE C REINMILLER TRUST INC LUKE GINGER G (+) Perm

9705010237 05/01/1997 RECONVEYANCE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO LUKE GINGER G (+) Perm

9806160311 06/16/1998 QUIT CLAIM DEED LUKE GINGER G LUECK HANS J & GINGER G (+) LOT 9 EVERGREEN W/F TRACTS BROWN’S ADD A/P 38180000090007 Perm
9810120250 10/12/1998 RECONVEYANCE REGIONAL TRUSTEE SERV CORP (+) LUKE GINGER G (+) Perm
200005015005 05/01/2000 SHORT PLAT MAP LUKE GINGER G (+) PUBLIC SEC 36 TWNSHP 27 RNG 03 NW NE Perm
200101040426 01/04/2001 POWER OF ATTORNEY LUCEK HANS-JAKOB LUKE GINGER G LOT 9 EVERGREEN W/F TRS BROWN’S ADD A/P 00381800000900 Perm

200103050738 03/05/2001 POWER OF ATTORNEY LUECK HANS J LUKE GINGER G LOT P/5 BLK 5 ALDERWOOD MANOR 6 003731005005003 Perm

200210301152 10/30/2002 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G AMERICA’S WHOLESALE LENDER (+) LOT 9 EVERGREEN W/F TRS BROWN’S ADD A/P 00381800000900 Perm
200302250605 02/25/2003 RECONVEYANCE RELEASE SYSTEMS INC (+) LUKE GINGER G (+) Perm
200803200381 03/20/2008 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G WACHOVIA MORTGAGE (+) LOT 13-15 EDMONDS HI-WAY TRS 00434500001306 Perm
200803240627 03/24/2008 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G (+) WACHOVIA MORTGAGE (+) LOT 9 EVERGREEN W/F TRS BROWN’S ADD A/P 00381800000900 Perm
200803260076 03/26/2008 RECONVEYANCE RECON-TRUST COMPANY LUKE GINGER G (+) Perm
200804080096 04/08/2008 RECONVEYANCE CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY (+) LUKE GINGER G (+) Perm
200804250078 04/25/2008 RECONVEYANCE CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY (+) LUKE GINGER G (+) Perm
200806160723 06/16/2008 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G (+) PACIFIC ONE MORTGAGE INC (+) LOT 9 EVERGREEN W/F TRS BROWN’S ADD A/P 00381800000900 Perm
200806160724 06/16/2008 ASSIGNMENT OF DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G (+) CLAUSEN MARK A (+) Perm 

201004160394 04/16/2010 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G (+) C C N J REAL INVESTMENTS L L C (+) LOT 9 EVERGREEN W/F TRS BROWN’S ADD A/P 00381800000900 Perm
201011220054 11/22/2010 RECONVEYANCE SOUND LEGAL CENTER P L L C (+) LUKE GINGER G (+) Perm
9702060305 02/06/1997 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G ETVIR (+) WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK (+) LT9 ASSESSORS PLAT EVERGREEN W/F TRS BROWN’S ADD Perm

9702060310 02/06/1997 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G ETVIR (+) WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK (+) LT11 HEINZ PARK Perm

9702060311 02/06/1997 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G ETVIR (+) WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK (+) P/LT5 BK5 A M 6 Perm

9806160311 06/16/1998 QUIT CLAIM DEED LUKE GINGER G (+) LUKE GINGER G ETVIR LOT 9 EVERGREEN W/F TRACTS BROWN’S ADD A/P 38180000090007 Perm
9806160312 06/16/1998 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G ETVIR (+) WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK (+) LOT 9 EVERGREEN W/F TRACTS BROWN’S ADD A/P 38180000090007 Perm
199906110707 06/11/1999 DEEDS(EXCEPT QCDS) THORNING THOMAS E & ELIZABETH P (+) LUKE GINGER G ETVIR LOT P/13-15 EDMONDS HI WAY TRACTS 43450000130209 Perm
199906110708 06/11/1999 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G ETVIR (+) WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK (+) LOT P/13-15 EDMONDS HI WAY TRACTS 43450000130209 Perm
200005080578 05/08/2000 DEEDS(EXCEPT QCDS) LUKE GINGER G ETVIR (+) LODWIG HOMES INC LOT P/13-15 EDMONDS HI-WAY TRS 43450000130209 Perm 

200101040427 01/04/2001 DEED OF TRUST LUKE GINGER G ETVIR (+) EQUITY ONE INC (+) LOT 9 EVERGREEN W/F TRS BROWN’S ADD A/P 00381800000900 Perm
200104100255 04/10/2001 RECONVEYANCE WASHINGTON RECONVEYANCE CO (+) LUKE GINGER G ETVIR (+) Perm
200109040096 09/04/2001 DEEDS(EXCEPT QCDS) LUKE GINGER G ETVIR (+) DUMITRU SORIN & DRAGOMIRELA LOT 11 HEINZ PARK 00468800001100 Perm
200109240186 09/24/2001 RECONVEYANCE WASHINGTON RECONVEYANCE CO (+) LUKE GINGER G ETVIR (+) Perm 

 NAME SEARCH: HANS LUECK

1 Lueck, Hans Jacob Defendant King County District 83-014671 05-20-2008

2 Lueck, Hans Jakob Defendant Seattle Municipal Ct 274871 08-19-1996

3 Lueck, Hans Jakob Defendant Sno Co-cascade Div XY0000533 01-28-2010

4 Lueck, Hans Jakob Defendant Seattle Municipal Ct 543087 08-26-2009

5 Lueck, Hans Jakob Defendant Sno Co-everett Div PC11-0905 04-01-2011

6 Lueck, Hans Jakob Defendant Snohomish Superior 11-1-01364-7 06-20-2011

7 Lueck, Hans Jakob Defendant Sno Co-cascade Div 1Z1105674 05-04-2011

NAME SEARCH:GEORGINA GAIL LUKE

1 Luke, Georgina Defendant Sno Co-south Div C03-00957 04-24-2003

2 Luke, Georgina Plaintiff King Co Superior Ct 09-2-24060-4 06-25-2009

3 Luke, Georgina Plaintiff King Co Superior Ct 09-2-23691-7 06-23-2009

4 Luke, Georgina Gail Petitioner King County District 56-000194 04-14-2005

5 Luke, Georgina Gail Defendant Lynnwood Municipal I00190936 02-04-2010

6 Luke, Georgina Gail Plaintiff Sno Co-cascade Div C10-01060 08-10-2010

7 Luke, Georgina Gail Plaintiff Sno Co-cascade Div S10-00026 02-10-2010

8 Luke, Georgina Gail Defendant King County District I05280656 06-07-2010

9 Luke, Georgina Gail Defendant King County District IU0034432 07-05-2011

10 Luke, Georgina Gail Defendant Clark County Dist 6541334 08-10-2011

11 Luke, Ginger Plaintiff King Co Superior Ct 09-2-14510-5 Available 04-02-2009

12 Luke, Ginger Petitioner Kcdc-west Div (sdc) 95-003625 04-11-1995

13 Luke, Ginger Plaintiff Snohomish Superior 99-2-03084-1 04-28-1999

14 Luke, Ginger Plaintiff King Co Superior Ct 94-2-12367-0 05-19-1994

15 Luke, Ginger GDefendant Kcdc-east Div (sho) Y4-000026 01-16-2004

16 Luke, Ginger G Plaintiff Kcdc-west Div (sdc) 92-008334 01-19-1993

17 Luke, Ginger Gail Petitioner Kcdc-east Div (sho) 93-00556D 04-29-1993

So lets dig a little deeper here, at some of Ms Luke’s Tax returns… Her petfinder.com page shows 3500 adopted dogs, at an average rate of 650.00 per dog, considering she gets free spays & neuters from a local teaching hospital I don’t see how she has a perpetual 10K vet bill… Considering she reported assets of 8K why doesn’t she use those to pay off some of the vet bill?

Gingers rescue 2009 She spent 141K buying dogs, & claims to have rescued 2580 dogs

Gingers rescue 2008 She spent 117K buying dogs & claims to have rescued 1865 dogs

Gingers rescue 2007 She spent 6400.00 buying dogs, & claims to have rescued 1087 dogs

For a grand total of 5512 dogs for 2007, 2008, & 2009

What about 2010 & 2011? I am still looking for the tax forms for those years

Her website shows 3500 dogs as being rescued…

I have forwarded this information to the Washington State’s Attorney General’s Office so let’s see what they do or don’t about it. It looks like I better hurry up & file my suit against her, I have most of it written out but now I have all kinds of new information!

See this is what the truth is, it is documented, it is black & white. Far different than the crap that Ginger spews about me, she lies, I have proof & now others can see what she is really about… I still have to add some more info so please keep checking back, I just need to get the documentation before I post it to cover myself.

 

wordpress visitor

And it only gets worse for Rasmussen’s “Charity”

I was snooping around to see if my 501 had been filed yet on the Secretary of State’s website & HOLY COW Look what I found. Seems the “charity” that all the Stevens & Spokane County attorneys were donating to is merely a front. They were admonished by the Washington State Attorney General for misrepresenting themselves as owning orphanages & that at some times not one single penny went to any charity work only “Administrative costs… The actual filing of charges is in the link below:

Childrens Care International Assurance of Discontinuation

Seems the “Charity is also not qualified to accept donations.

Legal Actions Taken by the Attorney General

Assurances of Discontinuance

The following is a list of Assurances of Discontinuance filed by the Washington State Attorney General’s Office. The individuals or entities listed below cannot legally solicit contributions in Washington State until the conditions set forth in the Assurance have been met.

Children’s Care International April 2007

Charitable Solicitations Program Charity Profile Report

Children’s Care International

Mailing Address:
c/o Labyrinth, Inc. – West
1808 Aston Avenue, Suite 230
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Street Address:
2711 NE 134th Street
VANCOUVER WA 98686
Registration #10670
Registration Status Not Registered
Corporation Name Children’s Care International View Details »
Other Names Used CCI
International Children’s Care (related Organization)
Phone (360)576-9685
Fax (360)573-0491
Email kent@forhiskids.org
Web Site
Purpose Description Providing financial and administrative support for children’s care programs, including orphananges in various parts of the world.
Federal EIN 01-0790946
Federal Tax Status Exempt 501C3
The following financial information has been provided to the Office of the Secretary of State by the above-named organization. Figures are for the organization’s fiscal year ending Dec 31, 2009.
Beginning Assets copy4,357
According to the financial information shown at left, this organization devoted 13% of its total expenses to program services during the year reported.
Revenue copy04,882
Program Services $8,254
Total Expenses $66,512
Ending Assets $9,169
Paid Fundraiser(s) Who Raise or Receive Contributions for This Charity
None reported.

http://www.sos.wa.gov/charities/search_detail.aspx?charity_id=10670

So we have a “charity” that doesn’t give anything to orphanages, who’s parent/partner organization is in Florida who has given Mr Rasmussen’s charity 46K

********************************************************

Recent Updates:

Water for Life Inc
wordpress visitor

Margi Hamilton – AKC Judge/Accused Animal Hoarder

The video is hard to ignore, even harder to refute. the fact that 14 dogs had to die, that almost 100 dogs were found between 2 people in 2 different houses… None of it is settling well with me.

There are things I know, people I know, & things I have learned. Margie is alone now to face this deluge by herself. Her husband died shortly after the raid. On the surface it seems as though it is a cut & dried case. If it was an investigation by King County Sheriffs or by King County Animal Control, in my mind it would be, but enter “Pasado’s Safe Haven” a group that that has many questionable endeavors under it’s belt. They slander people, interfere in criminal investigations & have had their own share of trouble in their own circle. The local newspapers have major misgivings about them as well. I always go to the Charity Navigator for info on a Charity & that is where you see things going south…

http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.comments&orgid=6634

They seem to be needing to get a handle on their own affairs. There are many different articles about them as well in the Herald:

House built on Pasado's property entangled in divorce
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20090517/NEWS01/705179941
Pasado’s agrees to changes by state (Please make sure to check out the documents included in this article)
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20101029/NEWS01/710309957/-1/NEWS
Pasado's Safe Haven: Charity is a force for animals, but critics question tactics, finances
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20090517/NEWS01/705179943
Pasado's vows fight, faces new questions Animal rescue charity says it's target of 'smear campaign'
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20090527/NEWS01/705279767
More to Pasado's story than dead 'puppies'
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20110411/BLOG48/704119864
Dog killer sentenced to 90 days
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20100709/NEWS01/707099848

MOST DISTURBING ARE THESE TWO STORIES, JUST BE WARNED THERE ARE GRAPHIC PICTURES OF THE DECEASED DOGS LEFT IN KENNELS FOR DAYS BY PASADO’S TO STARVE TO DEATH

PASADO CONTINUES TO LIE TO MAKE MONEY! IF YOU ARE AS DISGUSTED BY THESE PHOTOS AS WE ARE, NOW IS THE TIME TO PUT AN END TO "RESCUE" ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE IN IT FOR THE MONEY AND FAME!'
http://www.animalliberationfront.com/News/2005_10/PasadoLies.htm
Dog left to starve to death in it's cage after being DUMPED by Pasado's Animal Haven
http://www.forpitssake.org/ednah.html

I am just sick, I seen the pictures of these poor dead dogs, dogs left to starve to death in their cages because of the carelessness of Pasado’s. These are the people who are accusing Margie Hamilton of abuse? WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THAT PICTURE???

You know something else? I have had too freakin many dogs & while we were doing transfers have grabbed kennels from outside with hair like that on teh cages because they sat face down outside & got rained on, it was only temporary & the kennels were thrown outside & it NOW occurs to me anyone could’ve snapped a picture of it or took a film at that minute & I would’ve been screwed! The only thing that would’ve saved me is we were doing the transfers with the help of animal control & were in a hurry & had a critical situation going on.

But… C.A.R.E.S., King Co AC & the King County Sheriff’s I trust them with all of my heart, I also respect them very much so until I hear from them that there was abuse going on I will reserve judgement. CARES would not have put those 14 dogs down if they weren’t suffering, they would’ve done anything to save them if there had been even 1/10 of a percent that they could’ve lived.

It should also be noted the house in Burien is where the dogs were put down from, the dogs in the Issaquah house were taken because of the condition at the house in Burien, the reports don’t say who the “man” at the house was so we don’t know if it was her husband or not, her husband who just recently passed away, her husband she is trying to bury right now, we also don’t know if his health is what caused the decline, or what he died from, we don’t know why he didn’t reach out for help, we don’t know who the “man” was. We know that all of the Issaquah dogs were healthy, so why the contrast? What is the connection to both of the houses? I will keep digging til we get to the bottom of this. If one or both of them is guilty of what is being reported I hope the book is thrown at her, but if she is not, then I hope that she is vindicated.

I have had too many dogs, up to 32 one time for almost a whole day. Another time 24 at once for a couple of days & that was the closest to insanity I have ever been in life. Seriously by the time the volunteers got there the next day I was a crying mess, we have ONE foster dog here, which is a medical needs dog so I won’t even think about another dog, between her & my bulldog it is a full time job. I generally own 3 to 5 dogs at a time, but as I slow down with age well there is NO WAY I am going to ever get more than 3 rescue dogs at a time. Why? Because I can’t handle that many dogs but now my great-grandfather.. He never had LESS than 12 hound dogs. As soon as one would die of old age he’d go to the local feed store & search the big metal trough that perpetually held assorted puppies for just the perfect one. I still remember the pungent smell of puppy breath & hay & sitting in the tub with puppies crawling all over me.

Honestly I don’t care who you are, you don’t need 38 dogs, & you most certainly don’t need 62 dogs. I think that is abuse in & of itself, no matter how much staff, room or volunteers you have. How can you pay attention & interact with that many dogs with any kind of quality or anything even close to meaningful? You can’t!!! It was however brought to my attention that there are other scenarios that play out & other things to consider. as noted in this article.

Dog ordinance 'number limits' in Animal Laws are not logical or valid – Will You Help Fight This Animal Control Tyranny?
http://animalsclubfreedom.typepad.com/nationaldogpress/2011/12/dog-ordinance-number-limits-in-animal-laws-are-not-logical-or-valid-will-you-help-fight-this-animal-control-tyranny.html

That is exactly why I work with breeders. Reputable breeders, they will fix & vet the dogs & give them to me to adopt out most times, the animals aren’t unsocialized, but other breeders & showers like to talk so much crap & start so much trouble that at times they can get into trouble if they have no one to reach out to, animal rights groups bash the breeders, they are ostrasized by shelters & other rescues: So who can they turn to? NO ONE.

One thing I did see that makes me believe this whole story was the little Papillion looking dog who was spinning & barking, my experience with puppy mill dogs, chained dogs & crated for life dogs is that they spin sometimes for years afterwards. It was heartbreaking to watch & that is what prompted me to write about this, to look into it.

I figure until someone nails me to a cross & I can come back from the dead 3 days later, I’ll stay off that cross because I don’t belong there. Judge not lest ye be judged, I believe that is a DIRECT quote from the guy who was on the cross.

This woman is also trying to deal with the loss of her husband, her partner, her lover, her best friend, & deal with this mess. I can’t take any joy in kicking someone when they are down. If you can that says very little about you as a human being. I have confidence in the King County Authorities, but I did want to put it out there that Pasado’s intentions have not always been of the highest quality & standards & they should not being throwing too many stones from their little glass shack: I’m just saying!

I also absolutely dare, Pasado’s to try to threaten to sue me: I could bring up my own lawsuit that would keep them busy for years to come two words, Angel & Brewster…

wordpress visitor

Disproportionate prosecutions in the City of Everett

So far this year they have found 2 people dead in the Snohomish county jail. Diane Cowling of Granite falls & another woman they have not released the name of shortly after I spent my 2 days in jail.

So when I go to my Kangaroo court trial it is a very real possibility that they will convict me, I don’t have the discovery requested, nor do I have an expert witness. I have someone who will file an automatic appeal at Snohomish County if my attorney doesn’t I’ve got a pre-paid bond to bail me out & my dog has gone to her new temporary home. Appeal will be a simple matter, but I was trying to get a “feel” for what could or would happen to me as far as sentencing.

None of the cases I have researched seem to make any sense below is just a few of the cases, the 2 horse cases are different. The guy that hung his pit bull & drilled holes in it’s poor little body, got 90 days, the lady who starved horses to death got 5 days, the lady who’s horses were neglected got a couple of months, no one was ever charged for putting the poor little monkey in the dishwasher & scalding him to death, the cat killer my have had the charges dismissed (but that may be because he is military so they may have taken over the case) the guy who was caught having sex with his animals, dismissed, the guy & his mother (who died in jail) who let all their animals starve to death got 5 months, no one was ever charged in the case of the 2 pit bulls who were hung in their back yard, or the guy who shot & drug his neighbors dog to death or the teens who shot the cat. ALL DELIBERATE acts of animal cruelty, & they are charging me for “Failure to provide humane care” for sleeping in the car with my dogs & cat, for not dumping them at the shelter, for trying to hold my fur-family together. Not only that but they crossed the QUARTER MILLION DOLLAR mark a while ago in their pursuit of trying to charge me, they have broken over 80 laws, rules & Constitutional Amendments to do so. They have private city council meetings about me, 3 that I know of, maybe more. They have their witness posting my personal information, a lot of that is false, they are encouraging her to do so & to file false police reports, they are releasing my personal info to help her harass me. My attorney is NOT challenging anything, he is not getting the information I need to even get an expert witness. My animals were not dehydrated, diseased, or infested with fleas, they were not starving, they were not beaten or abused, they were simply sleeping in a car for a couple of weeks with me, & I got our place shortly thereafter because it was not a permanent situation, it was temporary. Only 1 of my animals tested positive for Giardia 16 days after he was taken via lab results & I can’t even be sure of that since I haven’t actually seen ANY LAB RESULTS

1) Sailor accused of killing wife's cat with an ax
http://marysville.komonews.com/news/crime/678925-sailor-accused-killing-wifes-cat-ax
2) Woman gets 5 days for mistreating, starving horses
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/117208348.html
3) Woman gets 2nd sentence for starving horses
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/33835639.html
4) Judge rejects charges in monkey's scalding death
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20081030/NEWS01/710309915
5) Snohomish horse rancher may be charged
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20100410/NEWS01/704109887
6) Dog killer sentenced to 90 days
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20100709/NEWS01/707099848&news01ad=1%20dog%20killer%20sentenced

But… Let’s examine the Everett Animal Shelter’s policies & practices, there is no way that my car was any worse than what they were subjected to at the shelter, far worse by any means.

The Everett shelter has a 501(c)3 supposedly started by volunteers & at one time the shelter manager was the Chairman/Director of the 501, & the shelter manager at the same time. He was supposedly gone for the past 2 years but until I asked about it he was listed as the shelter manager til somewhere around August on the City’s website.  The charity listed 92K in assets & donated about 40K to a spay & neuter program which makes no sense since the spays & neuters are done by a city employee vet, yet when they had 2 kittens die from Kitty parvo they euthanized 81 cats, most of which were healthy because they “Claimed” they didn’t have the money to care for them when all that would have needed to be done is to observe them & either treat or euthanize any cats that showed symptoms. My next bone of contention is that they claim they came in & just found the animals dead… It DOES NOT work like that, those kittens would’ve been DEATHLY ILL & SHOWED SYMPTOMS FOR UP TO 5 DAYS BEFOREHAND & NO ONE NOTICED??? They also seem to be taking clues from the big boys of animal rescue rip offs… If an animal or situation makes the news & brings in donations they work their butts off to save the animals but if no one is paying attention they kill the animal(s) IMMEDIATELY! So why couldn’t Animal Rescue Foundation let go of a few dollars to save them? Well because they are a money maker, they no more could care about animals then Hitler cared for the Jews, otherwise they would’ve coughed up the money to help, it was THEIR decision not to help, not to give up money that PEOPLE GAVE TO THEM TO SAVE ANIMALS.  Homeless people & destitute people’s pets are immediately euthanized, they don’t even make an attempt to reach out & save these creatures. I can still hear that stupid witch laughing in my nightmares when I started crying because I found out my dog was dead, the so-called shelter manager Shannon DelGado. I can still see the fat little pig faced cow when she took my animals, standing around laughing & joking.

What is NEVER reported is the daily murders of Pit Bulls & anything they perceive to be a bully breed, no one has reported on all the dogs who have died because they are refusing to let anyone who was on my witness list pull pit bulls anymore. I will go find ARF’s financial statement for last year to show everyone their assets, so before you donate to them consider where your money WON’T be going. Donate to PAWS, Seattle Humane, Seattle Shelter, King County Shelter, local rescues, anyone but them, as long as you feed the pig animals will die for no reason.

1) Everett man sentenced to four years after he admits to robbing banks ‘out of desperation’
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20111122/NEWS01/711229858/0/SPORTS07#
2) 81 cats euthanized after virus spreads through animal shelter
http://everett.komonews.com/content/81-cats-euthanized-after-virus-spreads-through-animal-shelter
3) Deer trapped along a fence, with no one to help
http://everett.komonews.com/content/deer-trapped-along-fence-no-one-help
4) Cats Found Dead, Sick in Home Raid
http://everett.komonews.com/content/cats-found-dead-sick-home-raid
5) Vets go extra mile for puppy mill dogs
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/40514182.html
6) Family cat caught on police property euthanized
http://www.krem.com/news/northwest-news/Family-cat-caught-on-police-property-euthanized-83984847.html

So these are the people I will have no defense against since my lawyer Doug Ricks is not doing anything, he is not giving me discovery because the city is not giving him the proper discovery, he is not challenging anything, he is more than willing to let me go to court without an expert witness, he is not even at this point communicating with me.

I can however exercise my 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO FREE SPEECH! I can call the fat cow a fat cow, I can call the judge prejudice, I can call the prosecutor corrupt, I can say they are white brown or yellow, I can describe them as big little fat short or tall because I am just an average citizen. I am not blogging in any official capacity. I have not lied about anyone, nor have I said anything that can not be backed up with public records & documents. I am also entitled to my opinion & my opinion is that I am being targeted by a bunch of prejudiced, egotistical, sadistic, maniacal jerk offs. That is okay because I have a BIG SURPRISE FOR EVERYONE THE DAY OF MY TRIAL. I am learning more & more about my rights as a citizen of the United States & I am learning how to play their games.

It seems that more & more Cities around the country are realizing that they are breaking the laws with their back asswards laws, even

New "dangerous dog" ordinance gives canines another chance
 http://everett.komonews.com/content/new-dangerous-dog-ordinance-gives-canines-another-chance
wordpress visitor

Be a wise consumer The truth about shelters, & animal welfare groups (Part One)

Everyone I believe has good intentions. People see the HORRID commercials from ASPCA, HSUS, AHA, & even PETA & they pick up the phone & donate away. What they don’t realize is this

HSUS doesn’t have any shelters, they show up with the media & leave when they do. They dump the animals that they have “rescued” at local shelters & take the money & run, they also claim to have animals they don’t, that are long dead, or that another rescue is footing the bill for. They advocate legislation that strips Americans of their basic rights & eventually they will outlaw all meat eating if they get their way. Now why would that worry me? I don’t eat meat except for maybe a couple times a year, never if I can help it. I have had experience with HSUS with the Kennewick Puppy Mill fiasco, so this is not something the CCF/Humane Watch told me. I might add that most of their legislation either destroys the constitution or does NOTHING. Take our new “Puppy Mill Law” sounds really convincing til you get to the last paragraph. You can not start a NEW puppy mill with over 50 dogs, but if you were here already you are grandfathered in. WTH? Did the older puppy mills pay for that to eliminate the competition? Oh but hold up, any pet owner can be stripped of at least 4 of their constitutional rights if an animal control or police agency get it in for you. So YOU donated 500 Million dollars to HSUS to dump off animals at high kill shelters which are already full & over capacity, & to help in the erosion of your constitutional rights as a citizen of the United States of America. Back to CCF I don’t approve of their ways very much but they do have a very good article that explains what HSUS is really about. I only reference this because they use documentation to back it up. I wouldn’t support them either, they want you to donate money to them to bash & watch HSUS, but please use that money for a local shelter or rescue!!!

Humane Society Of The United States

ASPCA yes they have shelters, they are doing some good for actual animals but alas… the money from their shows in New York & Houston were not enough, so they coined a new “Bread N Butter” term HOARDERS, there is NO scientific, nor psychiatric designation for it, & it has gotten so out of hand that I was recently called by a police agency in SW Washington for a “horrendous hoarding situation” I got there & there were 8 damn dogs I DROVE 187 MILES FOR 8 DAMN DOGS???? I took the dogs, helped the lady shovel about 1/4 of a wheelbarrow full of the dog poop out of her front yard, steam cleaned her carpets & gave her damn dogs back to her.

Now keep in mind these words:

Hoarder

Horrendous

Deplorable

PETA They have always been a little off, but they have other agendas now. Their vision is to eliminate ALL animal ownership, all farming, & all meat eating, include fishing in that. It was them who had a hand in the EPA calling HAY a pollutant, I swear with God as my witness the EPA has declared hay a pollutant, you can’t even make crap like this up. If a farmer opens a bale of hay in his field & the EPA agent comes by & sees it, they can fine the farmer or rancher, or even the homeowner, to date this ridiculous bullcrap has not been levied against any of the big slaughterhouses though, they would have the money to fight it, & that is not the goal anyway, the goal is to run all the small farmers & ranchers out of business so they can take down the big boys but get funding to do so from seized property & assets off the backs of the smaller guys.

AHA The American Humane association, a spin off of HSUS. This is the agency you should fear. They are consolidating Children & Animals “Protection”. For those of you who don’t know. Centuries ago there were Animal Protection laws long before there were ever any Child Protection Laws, as a matter of fact the Child Protection laws we have today were modeled after the olde Animal Protection laws. True story. AHA has the absolute power to harm, & they are gearing up in light of the recent mistrust towards HSUS to go for major campaigns.

ALF Animal Liberation Front… Now they mostly go after labs, & institutions, who systematically torture & maim animals for YEARS, legally, they are way over the top but I’d bet my life the animals they set free or save don’t care, as long as their suffering stops. You don’t see them on TV misrepresenting themselves, or pulling at your heartstrings to get to your credit card, they take action, they do, they react. What I would really like to see is them sneaking up on a group of baby seal hunters & club them to death but I don’t know enough about them to give you clear concise information one way or the other. Sorry.

Okay so now remember the words up above? You will hear them in every cruelty or neglect situation involving animals & children, I have even heard of a case where a woman had 5 children & she is now being called a “Child Hoarder” WTF??? Are we in China? So now we are limiting the amount of children one can have? Farmers, & ranchers can’t feed their animals, people can’t have more than a set number of children, & animal welfare laws let the Government seize your animals & property at their whim with NO recourse unless you have the time money & resources to go to the United States Supreme Court, which is where I am heading with my case.

So before you pick up the phone for the SAME tired ass commercial please remember you will be funding, destruction of your own & other American’s civil rights, you will be paying over 240 million for high priced, corporate salaries, trips, & fringe benefits, there are millions of animals in this country that REALLY need your help, there are 100’s of thousands of them dying today & 100’s of thousands sitting in a dumpster waiting for the garbage man or for the rendering plant to come & make DOG & CAT food out of them, yes you are feeding your animals other dead dogs, cats, roadkill, downer & diseased animals & then wonder why the cancer rate in our pets have gone up over 5000% percent

WHAT’S REALLY IN YOUR PET’S FOOD?

So there is what I know about animal welfare advocacy groups & pet food…

Moving on to Shelters

Let’s start with shelters… First & most importantly shelters are not yours or animals friends, they don’t have a magic wand that finds magically perfect homes for animals, they employ bullies, & they kill animals. I always get a kick out of euthanasia vets who cry & whine about how much they DON’T want to kill these animals & how bad THEY feel about it, but they go to work everyday & do the same thing over & over again, they look an animal who is scared & fighting for it’s life in the eye, or who is looking up at them with trusting eyes & THEY KILL THEM. A shelter is a warehouse for idiot irresponsible owners to get rid of their responsibilities & walk away from a creature who would have gladly given their lives for these assholes, all the animals got for their love & loyalty was a cold hard needle & having their bodies dumped in the trash with other animals who were dumped & abandoned. Unfortunately there are still MILLIONS of people who still believe that shelters are good places. Now there are shelters who do try, who will move mountains to save as many animals as they can. I have the pleasure of working with quite a few of them.

In order to understand how a shelter operates & functions you have to have some grasp or accounting, politics & human nature. You have City shelters, & you have private shelters, private shelters are usually publicly funded by donations. County, or City shelters, are run on a budget delegated by several factors, the number of intakes, adoptions & euthanasia rates. It guarantees the death of animals. Okay if a shelter takes in 5000 animals a year & adopt out 4800, there is a need for services to sustain the animals, but not a huge need for money because it is assumed the adoption fees in part fund some of the daily operations, but if that same shelter takes in 5000 animals & has to euthanize 4000 animals well hells bells there is a HUGE problem & they need super funding.

There is more money in death then in actually putting forth the effort to save any animals, not to mention they sell the dogs & cats bodies to a rendering plant to make more dog & cat food so they get some extra money there, money by the POUND.

I hear this complaint all the time from people. The shelters charge such a high fee for little dogs… The reason is because the fee from that dog will keep 2 to 3 other bigger less adoptable dogs ALIVE, seriously. If you can not afford the extra hundred or so bucks for a little dog then what happens if your dog gets sick & I mean to tell you that little dogs cost 10 times more to take care of then a big to medium dog.

The best advice I can give you is to investigate any shelter or rescue that you are going to adopt from, donate to or volunteer with. They are not all good, they are not all bad, but most could be better with more community support.

Of course I am going to examine the Everett Shelter & the Everett Animal Rescue Foundation (ARF). This is a VERY strange creature. It is a city shelter that has a 501(c)3 & it is strange. The non profit reports 90K in assets, & has donated about 40K to taking care of dogs at the shelter, the shelter manager was Bud Wessman who was also the head of the non-profit, but then he “stepped down” as the shelter manager & was running the non profit. BUT up til I made a stink about it he was still listed as the shelter manager & Shannon Delgado was listed as the assistant, supposedly because the shelter couldn’t afford to give her the title of manager & now all of a sudden she is the manager, or she is listed as such… but so was Bud Wessman for 2 years after he was supposedly gone. I’ll figure it all out with my pubic records request. The interesting thing is that since the charity supposedly “belongs” to the City of Everett all of it’s dealings are considered part of the public record, but they don’t list there financial report on there page, it always listed as “coming soon” Now we all now I was rescuing animals from the Everett shelter & they were ALL coming out injured or maced, sometimes both. Once I complained about it they stopped me from pulling anymore dogs with a crapload of bureaucratic bull. Fine I did what the others in the rescue community asked me to do, keep my mouth shut & back off, but by then they had it in for me. I will be interested to find out what their euthanasia rates are now that they have the 501(c)3 with an extra 50K laying around, again that will go to the public records request. It should be zero to none with that kind of money rolling in.

Please also keep in mind, they had access to 90K when they euthanized something like 82 cats because the one came in with kitty distemper or some other disease, they could’ve saved those cats but they chose to murder them ALL, no one was even given a chance, they were systematically murdered one by one in less than a day. So they saved their precious money & even made some off of the cats bodies. Oh & here’s a nugget for all of you cat lovers out there, this month & part of next month almost all of the black cats are killed because of Halloween, they wont adopt them out & that was their policy, the same for Seattle Humane Society, but they don’t murder them, they just take them off the floor or keep them in foster.

I can only speak about shelters I have dealt with because it is my butt on the line but again I have worked with a lot of good shelters, city & county funded & privately funded. If you look east of the mountains here in Washington at the small underfunded shelters that is where you will find your faith in human beings again, most of the shelter managers, workers & volunteers will spend most of their own paychecks to get dogs & cats safe & out of the shelter or get them fixed, or get them medical attention, & they get limited funding, sometimes not even enough to buy food let alone meds or get the animals spayed or neutered, they pay for it, they beg for it, & they hustle for it.

So the next time you are thinking about donating to some big corporation who does nothing for animals, please look to the smaller rescues & shelters & consider saving a life. The next time you are looking for a new family member look across your own state & as always if you see a dog from Seattle to Spokane you want but can’t drive in the snow or get across the mountains, you email me immediately & I will go get the dog or cat for you for the cost of the gas money!!!

 

Stay tuned for my next (Part2) write up about rescues. Education is key, please take the time to research any agency you are dealing with.

 

wordpress visitor

Stalled out in Stevens County

UPDATE:
I am at a stall with my investigations into Stevens County until I get the records I requested. Here’s a smile for the day. The lady who’s case I am investigating & the prosecutor seems to have run out of his own words & is using mine now.

In order to get records from Stevens County you have to go through the prosecutor’s office, if they somehow decide to grant your request they forward it on which seems pretty shady to me, but that’s how they do it.

They asked what I needed the records for & I said to establish a pattern of harassment. The “Information Officer” told me alot of the details of the case & invited me to come to Stevens County so I could look at all of the evidence. I called the lady back & asked her if A B C D E & F are true & what her side of the story was on it.

Two things happened that day. She evidently wrote a letter to the prosecutor/information officer, & Mr Rasmussen called her attorney ONCE AGAIN threatening to press new charges on her. Some time later the Info Officer forwarded me her letter, which quite frankly I didn’t understand but then I laid into him about harassing her, about having a bunch of innocent rescuers going over there trying to save dogs lives because the a-holes told us all if we didn’t get the dogs off of her property they were going to mass execute all of them. They keep telling the rescuers that they are not at fault for going onto private property & taking someone’s dogs, livestock & property & I told them they needed to quit lying to people & cited the laws that were broken & told them I finally had proof of Mr R’s wrong doing as far as his charity was involved & I’ll be damned to hell if with 90 minutes of my email Mr Rasmussen didn’t send a Sheriff Gowin down to her property to ENTER ILLEGALLY without a search warrant to come on her property & start taking pictures of her tenants, & contractors, dogs & horse. I got a call from the contractor who was afraid for his own life but Ms D. was on the ground & the Sheriff just let her lay there so the poor guy ran down the driveway about 400 feet to help her up. He was terrified for his own dogs as well & hid them.

So I finally got a hold of Ms D. last night through Yazmine & found out that now Mr Rasmussen is once again threatening/bargaining with Ms D. attorney. The State Court of Appeals has agreed to hear her case but threw out the states motion & chastised them on top of it. So Mr R asked Ms D’s attorney to ask her to drop her appeal & he would drop the probation violation… The problem with that is HE HAS NO JURISDICTION to do so, the agreement with the appellate court basically puts a “stay” on all proceedings, so he can’t do anything about it either way but it should be noted that he believes he has more power than the Washington State Supreme Courts do. Obviously that didn’t work so then he reverts back to threats & here is where he runs out of words.

Ms D. sent out 2 emails to various people who are currently withholding information on the whereabouts of her dogs BECAUSE Mr Rasmussen is telling them they are in the right ONLY to cover his butt because he knows when the boom falls it’s going to land on him & he doesn’t care if he takes the rest of us with him. SO now he is threatening to file charges against Ms D. for harassment for requesting information saying that “He was going to show a pattern of harassment” pretty much used MY words for the rest of it too. Even though I pointed out that him filing additional charges & harassing her further would ONLY bolster her case & show it for what it was. Malicious harassment. Plain & simple.

This is what happens when folks start to think they are above the law. So if Ms D. shows up dead or completely disappears we know who to look at, following are the 2 letters I sent to them.

THIS WAS MY EMAIL IN RESPONSE TO HIM SENDING ME HER LETTER.

I see the letter I don’t understand the letter. I don’t think she is speaking to me but since I stuck my own feet in it & everyone here has their butts in a sling over the legalities of these dogs, who are now in loving homes, except for the 5 that were lost or killed. Everyone’s attorneys are referring them back to the case in Spokane where they adopted out a dog from another jurisdiction, so everyone here is liable for civil & possibly criminal action depending on how far she is willing to take it & she doesn’t really have anything to lose either way. Everyone is lawyered up & waiting for the boom to fall. Other rescues have contacted me saying that someone in your office is telling them she can’t do anything, that they have nothing to worry about & that is a bald faced lie. Then Mr Rasmussen is threatening to press more charges on her, for what I don’t know but all that is doing is adding FUEL to her fire, she has already lost almost everything. I really have tried to come up with ways where this could work out for everyone, she wants her dogs & property back, she is legally entitled to that, & because of the shoddy job that your lawyers did for the appeal court they won’t even hear your side of the case & are moving forward with her’s. Please get a tape of it & look over it, someone should’ve at the very least thrown in a case or two & in the Justices’ response they even said it not their job to make a case for the state. So on these very important last 2 issues it looks from all perspective she will win & then not only will your county be screwed, but lots of good rescuers who were doing nothing more than your office’s bidding because you had an insane sheriff telling everyone he was going to kill the dogs if we didn’t move our butts into gear & get them out, when in reality she was not on the property, some of the animals weren’t even hers but Glover had to be a jerk & I do mean to tell you he is a jerk & he said he was acting under Mr Rasmussen’s orders to several of us. Every lawyer up here is itching for a shot at you guys.

I really appreciate the time & effort that you spent on me, & I have nothing against anyone up there except for Mr Rasmussen for getting all of us involved in his big headed issues & that Officer Glover. I want to write him a letter myself, before he tries to utterly destroy someone he should make sure they are destroyed, this one has some fight in her & a caveat for if she dies!!! Remember she used to be the sweetheart of some mighty big firms over here, which puts a lot of folks over here in a bind because a lot of the good lawyers are conflicted out. It’s just like with my own issue, over here, I tried to explain to everyone, you don’t take EVERYTHING from someone & leave them standing, because then they have nothing to lose, all they have is time to focus on the issue. I also hope that Mr Rasmussen understands any new charges at this point will look exactly like what it is, pure & simple retaliation. I have read most of the statements that I have access to & the only people who were against her were people she had had issues with before, legal issues, so that doesn’t look good, my understanding is the video authenticator said the tapes were so spliced & diced that they wouldn’t be any more admissable than tapes of bigfoot at the mall.

I am going to try to go down to her place over here & see if I can talk to her again, to atleast see if we can get her to leave some of the rescuers out of this, but I took her to see 2 of her dogs here, they were so shell shocked that even I cried for them. I go every week up into the mountain looking for her other dog(s) that were lost, & most times it ends with me sitting down bawling my head off because I have never failed a dog that miserably, we think 1 of them is dead, but the boy has a gimpy foot & I find his tracks quite often. These are not my dogs, so I can only imagine how she must feel, if she didn’t fight for them then I would question her motives. I am on a sinking ship either way, & Stevens County’s ship is taking on water too. No one is going to “win” in this case.

I still don’t understand the purpose of the ferocity of the prosecution of Ms D., it was ALL OUT WAR, it bordered on illegal from the beginning. She writes an article, 2 weeks later her property is raided, she pisses off a horse thief, Mr Rasmussen sends neighbors over to harass the dogs & her. Next thing you know she is sitting in jail, he illegally orders all of her property disposed of, she is denied medial access & outside access from the jail, til her piece of garbage lawyer comes to see her to tell her all of the animals were gone & that he wasn’t doing anything more on her case, who by the way is one of the lawyers who donated to Mr Rasmussen’s partner charity that turned around & donated the money back to him. Do you see where this is NOT looking good for any of us? The idiots who posted on the news stories, in the comment sections pretty much gave her all the ammo she needs. Because of the bad advice Mr Rasmussen is giving them they thought they were in the right but these past few weeks they have found out they are not. I would not be surprised if you end up with about 20 more records requests by the time this goes to appeal. I am trying to clear my schedule so I can come over there personally to see the court stuff as well. Thank you for forwarding my request to the Sheriff’s office, though.

Again all I want to know is why it was so important for Mr Rasmussen to totally annihilate Ms D..

Brandia

THIS WAS MY LETTER TO HIM AFTER I FOUND OUT THAT OFFICER GOWIN HAD COME DOWN ON HER PROPERTY & ENTERED ONTO HER PROPERTY ILLEGALLY & TOLD HER THAT MR RASMUSSEN HAD SENT HIM DOWN THERE

Really?????????? I just went down to see Pam she is not here, she is over there, cause she had to keep an eye on her contractor & Mr Rasmussen sent a sheriff out to her property to take pictures & harass her. Are you guys serious? Her tenant called me in a panic saying she WAS ON THE GROUND & THE PIECE OF CRAP SHERIFF JUST LEFT HER THERE! What is wrong with you people???? I am calling the newspapers & TV stations in the whole state & giving them all the paperwork I have from the charities & all of the other info I have about Mr Rasmussen. I really hope he is proud of himself, the contractor has also sent me VIDEO from his cell phone!!! This is why I don’t believe one line of spiddle that comes out of Mr Rasmussen’s mouth. If anything happens to her I am going to make sure all of you are held accountable in every way. I am also contacting her tort lawyer & forwarding everything to him so even if she has a damn heart attack none of you will have gotten away with this. What kind of agency leaves a senior woman on the ground to die, yes she could’ve died. If anything happens to her in the meantime YOU WILL ALL BE ACCOUNTABLE, & remember getting rid of her does nothing she has an attorney that is going to proceed in the case of her death. How dumb can you all be? I want the public disclosure records, all of them. That is all.
Rev. Brandia Taamu

wordpress visitor

Back to Stevens County Prosecutor’s "Charity"

HERE IS ALL THE NEWEST INFO ON THE CHARITY THAT MR RASMUSSEN SUPPOSEDLY MAKES NO PROFIT OFF OF BUT GETS 13,000.00 GRANTS FROM. AMAZING & NOW I UNDERSTAND WHY HE SO VEHEMENTLY ATTACKED A PERSON HE WAS PROSECUTING ABOUT HER 501(C)3 SAYING SOME VERY OFF THE WALL THINGS ABOUT FRAUD & SECTRETING AWAY FUNDS OR PROPERTY… IT IS TRUE SOMETIMES PEOPLE ACCUSE OF WHO THEY ARE OR WHAT THEY ARE DOING. NO WORRIES BECAUSE I HAVE FORWARDED THIS TO HER AS WELL SO SHE MIGHT BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND WHERE HIS RANTINGS CAME FROM. I’M SURE SHE CAN USE IT IN HER CASE AS WELL. JUST PUT IT THIS WAY, I AM TIRED OF CORRUPTION, THE GOOD OLD BOY CLUBS & PROSECUTORS & JUDGES WHO THINK THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW. I AM GOING TO BE THE ONE WHO GOES AFTER EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. THE PEN IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD & I’LL DAMN SURE BET YOU, YOU’LL RUN OUT OF INK BEFORE I DO! IF EVEN SO MUCH AS ONE HAIR ON THIS WOMAN’S HEAD IS DISHEVELED I WILL MAKE SURE I BRING EVERY AGENCY I CAN TO YOUR SLEEPY FILTHY LITTLE TOWN. IT IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE NOW, YOUR OPPONENTS CAN SEE THIS NOW, THE MEDIA CAN SEE IT. IT IS ALSO NOW COMMON KNOWLEDGE THAT YOU HAVE THREATENED THIS WOMAN. YOU ARE NO MORE THAN A BULLY WHO WEARS MORE MAKE-UP IN ONE PHOTO SHOOT THEN I WEAR ALL YEAR, BLOG ALL YOU WANT I CAN BLOG TOO, BLOW YOUR OWN HORN ALL YOU WANT BECAUSE I WILL BE THERE TO WATCH YOU FALL & OH WHAT A AWESOME SOUND IT MAKES WHEN THE MIGHTY FALL. HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE LOCKED UP IN YOUR COUNTY THAT SHOULDN’T BE? WORSE YET HOW MANY ARE WALKING AROUND FREE THAT SHOULDN’T BE??? THE GREATEST TRICK THE DEVIL EVER PULLED WAS CONVINCING THE WORLD HE DID NOT EXIST. I KNOW WHERE HE LIVES…

LOOK AT THIS SITE & DOWNLOAD THE 2 FILES FROM KREM NEWS THAT WILL SHOW YOU THE REST OF HIS LIES

http://www.krem.com/home/Stevens-Co-Prosecutor-accused-of-taking-money-in-exchange-for–99567354.html

WATER FOR LIFE INTERNATIONAL
UBI Number 602789670
Category REG
Profit/Nonprofit Nonprofit
Active/Inactive Active
State Of Incorporation WA
WA Filing Date 12/20/2007
Expiration Date 12/31/2011
Inactive Date
Registered Agent Information
Agent Name AARON RASMUSSEN
Address 1312 N MONROE ST
City SPOKANE
State WA
ZIP 99201
Special Address Information
Address
City
State
Zip
Governing Persons
President BARTHOLOMEW, ROD
13712 W LINCOLN RD SPOKANE, WA
Vice President BARHOLOMEW, GARY
13710 W LINCOLN RD SPOKANE, WA
Secretary RASMUSSEN, AARON
1702 N HOLLISTON RD SPOKANE, WA
Secretary WENDT, NORMA
PO BOX 538 SPOKANE, WA
Treasurer WENDT, NORMA
PO BOX 538 SPOKANE, WA
Chairman RASMUSSEN, TIM
17426 N MEADOWVIEW LN NINE MILE FALLS, WA

THIS IS PART OF THE STATEMENT THAT MR RASMUSSEN MADE TO THE BAR ASSOCIATION… YET IF THEY HAD BOTHERED TO ACTUALLY INVESTIGATE THEY WOULD’VE MOST CERTAINLY FOUND THIS. ISN’T THE BOARD MADE UP OF LAWYERS? SO BACK TO MY ORIGINAL QUESTION? WHY IS IT IF I CAN FIND ALL THIS INFO ON LINE, WHY CANT THE WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION? TO UNDERSTAND THEIR GOOD OLD BOY CODE OF HONOR IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THERE HAS ONE BEEN ONE CASE OF A PROSECUTOR EVER REPRIMANDED IN THE STATE OF WASHNGTON: JUST TO CLARIFY, THE WSBA HAS ONLY REPRIMANDED ONE PROSECUTOR EVER IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF OUR STATE EVEN THOUGH THOUSANDS OF CASES BEFORE THE APPELLATE COURTS CLEARLY SHOW PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT

Tim Rasmussen: “I am a board member of Water for Life International”… “I have never solicited or accepted any donations from any Washington criminal defense attorney for Water For Life International.” …. “I have accepted donations from Washington criminal defense attorneys who are friends to assist an orphanage in Guatemala. “… To do that I asked people I knew to donate to International Children’s Care for the Guatemalan facility.” All donors received a receipt for their in-kind donation directly from International Children’s Care” …”We pooled our resources and bought things for the campus and children. . . . “We sent the things in containers of equipment being sent to the orphanage by the drilling project.” . .. “ I did not benefit in any way, directly or indirectly from any contribution . .”.. “The Guatemalan Orphanage …is owned and operated by International Children’s Care which is based in Vancouver, Washington.”… “I am not connected to them in any way … except I have made donations and solicit donations from friends to assist the orphanage in Guatemala.”.

Contact Us Contact Information
Send email to: Info@H2oForLife.org
Water For Life International P.O. Box 2330 Deer Park WA 99006 Phone 509-842-3952

WATER FOR LIFE
“Container Travails – By Tim Rasmussen”
The container left Spokane for Guatemala on Dec 18. In it was the diesel air cooled engine, more steel well casing, stems of tools, welders, parts, 10 new hand pumps, the special deep well pump for JabonChe, and of course, some things for the orphanage.
We had been told the container shipment would take about 21 days, so Gary Bartholomew was expecting the container would arrive in the second week of January. That week and the next came and went, and still there was no word about the container. Inquires to our shipping agent revealed that the container had been offloaded in Mexico and not put back on the ship. The explanation was vague about why it came off the ship and even more vague about when it would be put back on a ship We were assured however, it would be on the next ship to Guatemala, whenever that would be be!
On January 21, Annette and I left Guatemala. It was a long 23 hour shuttle on and off planes from Flores to Cancun to Houston to San Francisco to Spokane. About a week after we got home, Gary was told the container had come into the country and was in the customs process. At least it had made it into the country.
The container was in the customs process for one week and no word. Then the shipping agent told us that for some reason, the container had been selected for special inventory inspection. The reason behind this selection was unknown, but maybe because it had made an unscheduled stop in Mexico. They insisted on checking on 75% of the contents. There was nothing to do but wait.
Finally on about Feb 15, Gary was told the container would be released immediately upon payment of about $7,000 US. There were the usual charges for storage during the inspection, the inspection itself, and a fee for this and a fee for that. Then he was told that if he waited for 2 more days there would be different supervisor and the fee would be about $500 US less! Gary thought for a moment but realized the extra charges and the waiting truck and the fees would make it about a wash. Gary paid the duty and got the shipment out of that den of thieves as quickly as he could. (I guess the word “thieves” is not politically correct, but that is the word that comes to mind.) The container was 58 days in transit, but he was happy we finally had it, until he opened the door.

What a bunch of Crap! What Timothy Rasmussen Doesn’t Say:
International Children’s Care is an organization which works through various partnership organizations. “VERSACARE” is one of its partner organizations. The VERSACARE Board oversees the assets from its Care Center operations and carries out its grant activities through THE VERSAFUND which annually distributes Grants to various supporting ministries and other qualified organizations, primarily within the Seventh-day Adventist denomination. WATER FOR LIFE (Tim Rasmussen is the Chairman of the Board) is a Seventh-day Adventist organization which is operating this year on a 2011 grant of $13,000 from THE VERSAFUND
(See Grant recipients below). VERSACARE is one of the primary partner organizations of INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN’S CARE (the organization which Tim Rasmussen claims he is not connected with in any way, and that he receives no benefit from directly or indirectly from any donation.)

About International Children’s Care (See, http://www.forhiskids.org/about.php)
International Children’s Care – Partnership Organizations. (See, http://www.forhiskids.org/partners.php)

VERSACARE 2011 Grant List
(SEE, http://versacare.org/grants/)

2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |
Organization
Country
Amount

Adventist Health Int’l. Curacao $50,000

Ayeyarwady Adventist Burma $25,000

Rocky Mountain Adventist USA $30,000

La Sierra University Archaeology USA $4,000

Rio Lindo Academy USA $15,000

Holbrook Indian School USA $35,000

Beltsville SDA Church USA $5,000

Brainerd SDA Church USA $15,000

La Sierra University SIFE USA $10,000

ICC El Salvador Nicaragua $100,000

Big Lake Youth Camp USA $12,000

Natives With A Mission USA $20,000

Leoni Meadows USA $20,000

Christian Record Services for the Blind USA $20,000

NAD Office of Education USA $52,500

Hope for Survivors USA $8,500

Women’s Healing & Empowerment USA $25,000

One Mustard Seed USA $6,850

Adventist Forum USA $50,000

Tappahannock SDA Church & Comm. Services USA $10,000

Brainerd SDA Church USA $15,000

Penn Valley SDA Church USA $15,000

Excel / Loma Linda Univ. Church USA $15,000

Parkview Adventist Church USA $20,000

Universidad de Montemorelos A.C. Mexico $35,000

Southwestern Adventist University / KGSW TV USA $25,000

La Sierra University Center for Conflict Resolution USA
$200,000

La Sierra University Womens Resource Center USA $20,000

La Sierra University School of Religion – HMS Richards Library USA $10,000

Hear and Home Africa $15,000

Adventist Southeast Asia Projects Asia $20,000

ETV Endowment of South Carolina, Inc. USA $50,000

LLU Medical Center – Dept. of Urology USA $20,000

Adventist Wholehealth Network – Parish Nurse Prep Course
USA $23,870

South Eastern California Conference USA $5,000

Water for Life Guatemala $13,000

Copyright © 2011 Versacare Inc – All Rights Reserved
4097 Trail Creek Road Suite B, Riverside – CA 92505
Telephone : (951) 343-5800 / Fax : (951) 343-5855
versacare@aol.com

RCW 19.09.020 Definitions.

When used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) A “bona fide officer or employee” of a charitable organization is one (a) whose conduct is subject to direct control by such organization; (b) who does not act in the manner of an independent contractor in his or her relation with the organization; and (c) whose compensation is not computed on funds raised or to be raised.

(2) “Charitable organization” means any entity that solicits or collects contributions from the general public where the contribution is or is purported to be used to support a charitable purpose, but does not include any commercial fund-raiser, commercial fund-raising entity, commercial coventurer, or any fund-raising counsel, as defined in this section. Churches and their integrated auxiliaries are not charitable organizations, but are subject to RCW 19.09.100 (12), (15), and (18).

(3) “Charitable purpose” means any religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purpose or any other purpose that is beneficial to the community, including environmental, humanitarian, patriotic, or civic purposes, the support of national or international amateur sports competition, the prevention of cruelty to children or animals, the advancement of social welfare, or the benefit of law enforcement personnel, firefighters, and other persons who protect public safety. The term “charitable” is used in its generally accepted legal sense and includes relief of the poor, the distressed, or the underprivileged; advancement of religion; advancement of education or science; erecting or maintaining public buildings, monuments, or works; lessening the burdens of government; lessening neighborhood tensions; eliminating prejudice and discrimination; defending human and civil rights secured by law; and combating community deterioration and juvenile delinquency.

(4) “Commercial coventurer” means any individual or corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, limited liability company, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or any other legal entity, that:

(a) Is regularly and primarily engaged in making sales of goods or services for profit directly to the general public;

(b) Is not otherwise regularly or primarily engaged in making charitable solicitations in this state or otherwise raising funds in this state for one or more charitable organizations;

(c) Represents to prospective purchasers that, if they purchase a good or service from the commercial coventurer, a portion of the sales price or a sum of money or some other specified thing of value will be donated to a named charitable organization; and

(d) Does not ask purchasers to make checks or other instruments payable to a named charitable organization or any entity other than the commercial coventurer itself under its regular commercial name.

(5) “Commercial fund-raiser” or “commercial fund-raising entity” means any entity that for compensation or other consideration within this state directly or indirectly solicits or receives contributions for or on behalf of any charitable organization or charitable purpose, or that is engaged in the business of or is held out to persons in this state as independently engaged in the business of soliciting or receiving contributions for such purposes. However, a commercial coventurer, fund-raising counsel, or consultant is not a commercial fund-raiser or commercial fund-raising entity.

(6) “Compensation” means salaries, wages, fees, commissions, or any other remuneration or valuable consideration.

(7) “Contribution” means the payment, donation, promise, or grant, for consideration or otherwise, of any money or property of any kind or value which contribution is wholly or partly induced by a solicitation. Reference to dollar amounts of “contributions” or “solicitations” in this chapter means in the case of payments or promises to pay for merchandise or rights of any description, the value of the total amount paid or promised to be paid for such merchandise or rights.

(8) “Cost of solicitation” means and includes all direct and indirect costs, expenditures, debts, obligations, salaries, wages, commissions, fees, or other money or thing of value paid or incurred in making a solicitation.

(9) “Entity” means an individual, organization, group, association, partnership, corporation, agency or unit of state government, or any combination thereof.

(10) “Fund-raising counsel” or “consultant” means any entity or individual who is retained by a charitable organization, for a fixed fee or rate, that is not computed on a percentage of funds raised, or to be raised, under a written agreement only to plan, advise, consult, or prepare materials for a solicitation of contributions in this state, but who does not manage, conduct, or carry on a fund-raising campaign and who does not solicit contributions or employ, procure, or engage any compensated person to solicit contributions, and who does not at any time have custody or control of contributions. A volunteer, employee, or salaried officer of a charitable organization maintaining a permanent establishment or office in this state is not a fund-raising counsel. An attorney, investment counselor, or banker who advises an individual, corporation, or association to make a charitable contribution is not a fund-raising counsel as a result of the advice.

(11) “General public” or “public” means any individual located in Washington state without a membership or other official relationship with a charitable organization before a solicitation by the charitable organization.
(12) “Membership” means that for the payment of fees, dues, assessments, etc., an organization provides services and confers a bona fide right, privilege, professional standing, honor, or other direct benefit, in addition to the right to vote, elect officers, or hold office. The term “membership” does not include those persons who are granted a membership upon making a contribution as the result of solicitation.

(13) “Other employee” of a charitable organization means any person (a) whose conduct is subject to direct control by such organization; (b) who does not act in the manner of any independent contractor in his or her relation with the organization; and (c) who is not engaged in the business of or held out to persons in this state as independently engaged in the business of soliciting contributions for charitable purposes or religious activities.

(18)(a) “Solicitation” means any oral or written request for a contribution, including the solicitor’s offer or attempt to sell any property, rights, services, or other thing in connection with which:

(i) Any appeal is made for any charitable purpose;

(ii) The name of any charitable organization is used as an inducement for consummating the sale; or

(iii) Any statement is made that implies that the whole or any part of the proceeds from the sale will be applied toward any charitable purpose or donated to any charitable organization.

(b) The solicitation shall be deemed completed when made, whether or not the person making it receives any contribution or makes any sale.

(c) “Solicitation” does not include bingo activities, raffles, and amusement games conducted under chapter 9.46 RCW and applicable rules of the Washington state gambling commission.

RCW 19.09.100 Conditions applicable to solicitations.

*** CHANGE IN 2011 *** (SEE 1485-S.SL) ***
The following conditions apply to solicitations as defined by RCW 19.09.020:

(1) A charitable organization, whether or not required to register pursuant to this chapter, that directly solicits contributions from the public in this state shall make the following clear and conspicuous disclosures at the point of solicitation:

(a) The name of the individual making the solicitation;

(b) The identity of the charitable organization and the city of the principal place of business of the charitable organization;

(c) If requested by the solicitee, the published number in the office of the secretary for the donor to obtain additional financial disclosure information on file with the secretary.

(2) A commercial fund-raiser shall clearly and conspicuously disclose at the point of solicitation:

(a) The name of the individual making the solicitation;

(b) The name of the entity for which the fund-raiser is an agent or employee and the name and city of the charitable organization for which the solicitation is being conducted; and

(c) If requested by the solicitee, the published number in the office of the secretary for the donor to obtain additional financial disclosure information on file with the secretary. The disclosure must be made during an oral solicitation of a contribution, and at the same time at which a written request for a contribution is made.

(3) A person or organization soliciting charitable contributions by telephone shall make the disclosures required under subsection (1) or (2) of this section in the course of the solicitation but prior to asking for a commitment for a contribution from the solicitee, and in writing to any solicitee that makes a pledge within five working days of making the pledge. If the person or organization sends any materials to the person or organization solicited before the receipt of any contribution, those materials shall include the disclosures required in subsection (1) or (2) of this section, whichever is applicable.

(4) In the case of a solicitation by advertisement or mass distribution, including posters, leaflets, automatic dialing machines, publication, and audio or video broadcasts, it shall be clearly and conspicuously disclosed in the body of the solicitation material that:

(a) The solicitation is conducted by a named commercial fund-raiser, if it is;

(b) The notice of solicitation required by the charitable solicitation act is on file with the secretary’s office; and

(c) The potential donor can obtain additional financial disclosure information at a published number in the office of the secretary.

(5) A container or vending machine displaying a solicitation must also display in a clear and conspicuous manner the name of the charitable organization for which funds are solicited, the name, business address, and telephone number of the individual and any commercial fund-raiser responsible for collecting funds placed in the containers or vending machines, and the following statement: “This charity is currently registered with the secretary’s office under the charitable solicitation act, registration number . . . .”

(6) A commercial fund-raiser shall not represent that tickets to any fund-raising event will be donated for use by another person unless all the following requirements are met:

(a) The commercial fund-raiser prior to conducting a solicitation has written commitments from persons stating that they will accept donated tickets and specifying the number of tickets they will accept;

(b) The written commitments are kept on file by the commercial fund-raiser for three years and are made available to the secretary, attorney general, or county prosecutor on demand;

(c) The contributions solicited for donated tickets may not be more than the amount representing the number of ticket commitments received from persons and kept on file under (a) of this subsection; and

(d) Not later than seven calendar days prior to the date of the event for which ticket donations are solicited, the commercial fund-raiser shall give all donated tickets to the persons who made the written commitments to accept them.

(7) Each person or organization soliciting charitable contributions shall not represent orally or in writing that:

(a) The charitable contribution is tax deductible unless the charitable organization for which charitable contributions are being solicited or to which tickets for fund-raising events or other services or goods will be donated, has applied for and received from the internal revenue service a letter of determination granting tax deductible status to the charitable organization;

(b) The person soliciting the charitable contribution is a volunteer or words of similar meaning or effect that create the impression that the person soliciting is not a paid solicitor unless such person is unpaid for his or her services;

(c) The person soliciting the charitable contribution is a member, staffer, helper, or employee of the charitable organization or words of similar meaning or effect that create the impression that the person soliciting is not a paid solicitor if the person soliciting is employed, contracted, or paid by a commercial fund-raiser.

(8) If the charitable organization is associated with, or has a name that is similar to, any unit of government each person or organization soliciting contributions shall disclose to each person solicited whether the charitable organization is or is not part of any unit of government and the true nature of its relationship to the unit of government. This subsection does not apply to a foundation or other charitable organization that is organized, operated, or controlled by or in connection with a registered public charity, including any governmental agency or unit, from which it derives its name.

(9) No person may, in conducting any solicitation, use the name “police,” “sheriff,” “firefighter,” “firefighters,” or a similar name unless properly authorized by a bona fide police, sheriff, or firefighter organization or police, sheriff, or fire department. A proper authorization shall be in writing and signed by two authorized officials of the organization or department and shall be filed with the secretary.

(10) A person may not, in conducting any solicitation, use the name of a federally chartered or nationally recognized military veterans’ service organization as determined by the United States veterans’ administration unless authorized in writing by the highest ranking official of that organization in this state.

(11) A charitable organization shall comply with all local governmental regulations that apply to soliciting for or on behalf of charitable organizations.

(12) An entity soliciting contributions for a charitable purpose shall not include in any solicitation, or in any advertising material for a solicitation, or in any promotional plan for a solicitation, any statement that is false, misleading, or deceptive. All solicitations, advertising material, and promotional plans must fully and fairly disclose the identity of the entity on whose behalf the solicitation is made.

(13) Solicitations shall not be conducted by a charitable organization or commercial fund-raiser that has, or if a corporation, its officers, directors, or principals have, been convicted of a crime involving solicitations for or on behalf of a charitable organization in this state, the United States, or any other state or foreign country within the past ten years or has been subject to any permanent injunction or administrative order or judgment under RCW 19.86.080 or 19.86.090, involving a violation or violations of RCW 19.86.020, within the past ten years, or of restraining a false or misleading promotional plan involving solicitations for charitable organizations.

(14) No charitable organization or commercial fund-raiser subject to this chapter may use or exploit the fact of registration under this chapter so as to lead the public to believe that registration constitutes an endorsement or approval by the state, but the use of the following is not deemed prohibited: “Currently registered with the Washington state secretary of state as required by law. Registration number . . . .”

(15) No entity may engage in any solicitation for contributions for or on behalf of any charitable organization or commercial fund-raiser unless the charitable organization or commercial fund-raiser is currently registered with the secretary.

(16) No charitable organization or commercial fund-raiser may engage in any solicitation for contributions unless it complies with all provisions of this chapter.

(17) No entity may place a telephone call to a donor or potential donor for the purpose of charitable solicitation before eight o’clock a.m. or after nine o’clock p.m. pacific time.

(18) No entity may, when contacting a donor or potential donor for the purpose of charitable solicitation, engage in any conduct the natural consequence of which is to harass, intimidate, or torment any person in connection with the contact.

(19) Failure to comply with subsections (1) through (18) of this section is a violation of this chapter

wordpress hit counter